Fresh Produce Discussion Blog

Created by The Packer's National Editor Tom Karst

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Grocery Manufacturers Association Comments on Safety of Artificial Colors

Grocery Manufacturers Association Comments on Safety of Artificial Colors



(WASHINGTON, DC) In comments today before the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Food Advisory Committee Meeting on certified color additives and hyperactivity in children, the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) made the following statement:



“The safety of artificial colors has been affirmed through extensive review by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) (via the food additive review process) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and neither agency sees the need to change current policy. All of the major safety bodies globally have reviewed the available science and have determined that there is no demonstrable link between artificial food colors and hyperactivity among children. These expert evaluations were conducted by the European Food Safety Authority(EFSA); the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ); the United Kingdom Committee on Toxicity (of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment) (UK COT); the German Federal Institute of Risk Assessment (BfR); the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, and the Processing Aids, Materials in Contact with Food and Cosmetics of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety.”



“GMA is comprised of producers, packagers and others who produce and sell food, beverages, and other packaged consumer goods. Ensuring the safety of our products – and maintaining the confidence of consumers – is the single most important goal of our industry. Product safety is the foundation of consumer trust, and our industry devotes enormous resources to ensure that our products are safe. Our companies continuously review and monitor all emerging science and scientific studies and incorporate these as warranted into our manufacturing practices to help ensure that we are always producing the safest possible product for our consumers.”

Lucas & Peterson Praise House Passage of H.R. 872

Lucas & Peterson Praise House Passage of H.R. 872
WASHINGTON - Chairman Frank Lucas of Oklahoma and Ranking Member Collin Peterson of Minnesota issued the following statements after the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011 in a bipartisan vote, 292-130.
"I am proud to be a part of the bipartisan effort that led to the House passage of H.R. 872. The last thing the agricultural community needs is another government mandate. This bill eliminates a costly and duplicative permitting requirement that is the result of a court’s fundamental ignorance of Congressional intent. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to join our efforts so that we can get a bill to the President before more valuable resources are wasted," said Chairman Frank D. Lucas.
“We first began looking into ways to address this issue last fall and I am pleased that, on a bipartisan vote, the House has approved H.R. 872. The courts are not the place to decide agriculture policy and this bill makes clear that it was never the intent of Congress to burden producers with additional permit requirements that would have little to no environmental benefit. I urge the Senate to quickly follow suit and provide certainty to producers by passing this legislation,” said Ranking Member Collin Peterson.

U.S. House Votes for Farmers, Passes H.R. 872: Western Growers’ Tom Nassif Releases Statement

U.S. House Votes for Farmers, Passes H.R. 872
Western Growers’ Tom Nassif Releases Statement

IRVINE, Calif. (March 31, 2011) –Western Growers President and CEO Tom Nassif released the following statement on the passage of H.R. 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011 in a bipartisan vote, 292-130.

“Today is a win for American farmers everywhere, especially our farmers in California and Arizona who grow most of the nation’s fresh produce. With the U.S. House’s passage of H.R. 872, there’s clear support for a regulatory environment that doesn’t strap farmers with unnecessary red tape. The bill is a practical, bipartisan example of eliminating government regulations that needlessly increase farm business costs. Farmers already must comply with federal pesticide label requirements, but the Environmental Protection Agency is now seeking to require farmers who apply pesticides near water to clear another regulatory hurdle—obtain expensive permits under the Clean Water Act. H.R. 872 puts an end to this redundant process for pesticide use. We look forward to the Senate’s approval of this common-sense approach to government regulations.”

Are you ready for changes in food safety?

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

JOINT EPA/FDA STATEMENT: Update on Ongoing Monitoring

JOINT EPA/FDA STATEMENT: Update on Ongoing Monitoring

In response to the ongoing situation in Japan, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has taken steps to increase the level of nationwide monitoring of milk, precipitation, drinking water, and other potential exposure routes.

EPA conducts radiological monitoring of milk under its RADNET program, while the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has jurisdiction over the safety, labeling and identity of milk and milk products in interstate commerce. States have jurisdiction over those facilities located within their territory.

Results from a screening sample taken March 25 from Spokane, WA detected 0.8 pCi/L of iodine-131, which is more than 5,000 times lower than the Derived Intervention Level set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These types of findings are to be expected in the coming days and are far below levels of public health concern, including for infants and children. Iodine-131 has a very short half-life of approximately eight days, and the level detected in milk and milk products is therefore expected to drop relatively quickly.

“Radiation is all around us in our daily lives, and these findings are a miniscule amount compared to what people experience every day. For example, a person would be exposed to low levels of radiation on a round trip cross country flight, watching television, and even from construction materials,” said Patricia Hansen, an FDA senior scientist.

EPA’s recommendation to state and local governments is to continue to coordinate closely with EPA, FDA and CDC – EPA will continue to communicate our nationwide sampling results as they come in.

For more information:

EPA: www.epa.gov/japan2011

FDA: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/ucm247403.htm

World record attempt for longest BLT planned

ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE GROCERS (AWG) TEAM UP WITH FARMLAND, GONNELLA, RED SUN GREENHOUSE TOMATOES AND
DOLE FRESH TO TAKE ON THE WORLD RECORD FOR LONGEST “BLT” SANDWICH ON WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27TH, 2011.

March 30th, 2011 – Kansas City, MO 169 Feet, that’s the current world record for the longest “BLT” sandwich, as documented by the World Records Academy based in Miami, Florida. Associated Wholesale Grocers (AWG) announced today that they will be challenging this record by creating a 200 foot long “Bacon Lettuce & Tomato” sandwich which will be hand crafted at their annual Spring Food Show on April 27th, 2011 in Kansas City.

This is not going to be just any old BLT sandwich, AWG knows and demands the highest of quality items for all of their member grocery stores and they have hand selected their ingredient partners to join them in this record breaking attempt. Teaming up with the master bakers at Gonnella for bread, Farmland Foods for the “B” in bacon, Dole Fresh for the “L” in lettuce and Red Sun Greenhouse tomatoes for the “T” in tomato, this BLT is ready to break the record not just in length...but surely will break the record in taste – if there was a record for taste!

What’s the recipe for this bold attempt? Take 200 feet of fresh Gonnella bread, slice in half length wise. Take slices of Farmland’s savory Bacon and cover the bottom layer of bread. Slice up some Red Sun greenhouse tomatoes and place on top of the bacon, then, pile on Dole’s fresh lettuce and sandwich it all together with another slice of bread on top! AWG will be accepting donations benefiting Muscular Dystrophy Association, for those attendees who want have a piece of the 200 foot masterpiece. Seems like a recipe for success, taking a bite out of history while contributing to a great cause.

Photos and video feed will be made available to the public via www.awginc.com . The world record will be posted, once officiated, on www.worldrecordsacademy.org

National Restaurant Association Member Tells Congress of Real Impact of New Health Care Law on Business

National Restaurant Association Member Tells Congress of Real Impact of New Health Care Law on Business

(Washington, D.C.) A Michigan restaurateur and National Restaurant Association member today gave the Subcommittee on Health of the House Energy & Commerce Committee a look at what it takes to run a restaurant business in the United States—and a daunting prognosis for what the new health care law could mean for businesses like his.

On behalf of the National Restaurant Association, Larry Schuler described for Congress how the law will significantly impact his employees and how he runs his business, and urged early action to make fundamental changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010. As the regulatory implementation moves quickly forward, the Association has attempted to constructively shape the regulations. Schuler said that without repeal or drastic changes to mitigate the most harmful effects of the new health care law, it will have drastic negative consequences on the restaurant industry and its employees.

The committee’s hearing was on “True Cost of PPACA: Effects on the Budget and Jobs.”

“We believe that offering health care coverage is the right thing to do and we are very proud of the fact that we have offered full medical coverage to our employees for a long time. However, faced with these very large increases in coverage costs, it will be extremely difficult for us to absorb these costs and continue offering coverage,” he said.

Schuler owns and operates three restaurants—one of them is a fourth-generation family restaurant opened by his great-grandfather in 1909. Schuler is now reexamining his plans to expand his business and create jobs in light of PPACA’s costs and administrative complexity. “Entrepreneurs like me are used to dealing with uncertainty and risk. We do so by preparing as best we can for the unknown. We have a glimpse of what is to come and have already begun preparing for the full implementation of this new law to preserve our businesses,” he added.

Schuler predicted that as a result of the new health care law defining a full-time employee as those working 30 hours per week, instead of the current 40 hours per week, and the requirement for employers to offer full-time workers health care benefits, the industry will have to more closely manage employees’ hours. In practice, labor and training costs, are already one of the most significant line item costs for restaurants. For employees, it may mean the need to get second and third jobs to make up for lost hours and income.

If the law is not repealed, Schuler urged the committee to make fundamental changes in how the law is implemented. Congress's goal must be to avoid job dislocation, not just in 2014, when U.S. businesses will be covered by the law's requirement that large employers provide minimum essential benefits to full-time employees or pay penalties, but before then, as employers begin planning for the law.

Schuler noted that the restaurant industry differs in significant ways from other industries, making compliance especially challenging for many restaurants. The restaurant industry is the nation's second-largest private-sector employer. Its nearly one million locations employ 12.8 million Americans, nearly 10 percent of the U.S. workforce. The industry is dominated by small businesses, with more than seven in 10 restaurants operating as single-unit establishments.

The industry’s workforce is also unique. More than half of the industry’s employees are under age 25; restaurants have a high proportion of part-time and seasonal employees; and the industry has a relatively higher turnover rate than other businesses. Labor costs are already one of the most significant line items for restaurants, accounting for about a third of the restaurant dollar. Restaurants have narrow pre-tax profit margins, averaging between 4 percent and 6 percent of sales, depending on the type of operation, according to National Restaurant Association research.

The NRA has been working since PPACA's enactment to help shape the regulations that implement the law. But some of the law's fundamental problems can’t be fixed through the regulatory process, Schuler said. "There are limits to the scope of change we can achieve through regulations."

The nation's restaurant industry looks forward to working with Congress “to improve health care for our employees without sacrificing their jobs in the process,” Schuler said.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Agriculture Secretary Vilsack in St. Louis to Highlight Strong Farm Trade, Encourage Passage of Korean Trade Agreement

Agriculture Secretary Vilsack in St. Louis to Highlight Strong Farm Trade, Encourage Passage of Korean Trade Agreement

ST. LOUIS, March 28, 2011 – Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack spoke today on the banks of the Mississippi River in St. Louis about the importance of sustaining the record-breaking productivity of America's farmers and ranchers. From the waterway that handles two-thirds of the nation's grain traffic – much of it destined for export markets around the world – Vilsack encouraged an audience of agriculture leaders from Missouri to focus on trade opportunities outside of our borders, as 95 percent of consumers live in foreign countries. Vilsack pointed to the U.S.-Korea Trade Agreement, which needs congressional ratification, as a means of sustaining the growth of the U.S. agriculture sector. Strong trade will be a key contributor to building an economy that continues to grow, innovate and out-compete the rest of the world.
"Within 500 miles of St. Louis, farmers are producing more than three quarters of the nation's corn and soybean crops, injecting $75 billion into the global economy and supporting 265,000 jobs for this region," said Vilsack. "At the heart of the nation's farm economy, St. Louis and this region are pumping life into the national economy. Farm exports alone will support more than one million jobs in America this year. And every dollar in exports generates another $1.31 in economic activity. Congress can help U.S. farmers and ranchers sustain their record growth by passing smart trade deals like the U.S.-Korea Trade Agreement, which will increase exports and support job creation here at home."
President Obama's National Export Initiative (NEI), a program intended to coordinate federal efforts to double U.S. exports by 2014 and create several million new jobs, is providing support to businesses big and small to reach more of the world's consumers, said Vilsack. Some of the world's most noteworthy agribusinesses call St. Louis home, employing 20 percent of the workforce within a 500-mile radius of the city. On-farm employment represents just one-tenth of all agriculture-related employment, as opportunities in research, education, food processing, and trade are abundant in the area. At the same time, Missouri farm exports have doubled in value over the past five years, giving farm income and on-farm jobs a boost.
Vilsack pointed out that economic output is estimated to grow more under U.S.-Korea agreement than from the United States' last nine trade agreements combined. That type of growth would bring additional jobs to agriculture-focused areas like the ports and infrastructure along the Mississippi River, from Minneapolis to New Orleans, said Vilsack. USDA recently reported that grain barge traffic on the Mississippi near St. Louis was up 126 percent over last year.
Vilsack discussed how the U.S.-Korea Trade Agreement, which needs congressional ratification, will add tens of thousands of jobs to the U.S. economy, especially in major agriculture-producing states like Missouri. The U.S.-Korea Trade Agreement would eliminate tariffs on a variety of American goods – including agricultural products like soybeans, feed grains and beef – while adding tens of thousands of jobs to our economy.
Exports of U.S. farm goods in fiscal year 2011 (Oct. 1, 2010 – Sept. 30, 2011) are projected to surpass previous records by $20 billion. The agricultural trade balance – a balance of U.S. exports versus foreign imports – is also projected to set a record surplus of $47.5 billion in 2011. In his remarks, Vilsack noted that every $1 billion in farm exports supports roughly 8,400 jobs in the United States.
#
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272(voice), or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).

Friday, March 25, 2011

USDA feature - transcript: Food prices going up

INTRO: A U-S Department of Agriculture economist says food prices are going up this year. The USDA’s Bob Ellison has more. (1:26)

EXPECT THAT TRIP TO THE GROCERY STORY TO GET MORE EXPENSIVE. THE U-S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE’S ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE SAYS FOOD PRICES SHOULD RISE FOUR PERCENT ACROSS THE BOARD WITH MEAT AND DAIRY PRICES LEADING THE WAY.

Ephraim Leibtag, USDA ERS: Meat and dairy prices are on the higher end there so some above four or five or even six percent. Pork right now is the highest that we are forecasting for an increase in twenty-eleven. But all of the meat products since they have animal feed as a big ingredient into their production costs. Those are going up a lot so the meat prices are going up, dairy prices as well.

AND ALTHOUGH PRICES IN THE OTHER FOOD AISLES SHOULD NOT BE GOING UP AS MUCH AS MEAT AND DAIRY, CONSUMERS WILL BE PAYING MORE THROUGHOUT THE STORE.

Leibtag: We’ll have fruit and vegetable prices that are rising a little bit faster than normal over the next three months or so. By the middle of the year most likely we’ll most likely start to see those things return to kind of what we would normally expect. The costs for grain products and that feeds into breads and pastas and cereals are all going up.

LEIBTAG SAYS HIGHER DEMAND, PRODCUTION AND INPUT COSTS ARE PUSHING FOOD PRICES HIGHER.

Leibtag: Right now, higher costs are one of the main factors. Another factor is we are coming out of recession, now we are seeing consumer demand increasing for food. And also we’ve seen higher commodity costs for oil and energy for corn and wheat and therefore transportation and packaging costs are going to go up, the raw ingredients are going to go up, the processing costs are going to go up and so those higher costs push into higher prices.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

DELAURO CALLS FOR FDA TESTING OF IMPORTED JAPANESE FOODS

DELAURO CALLS FOR FDA TESTING OF IMPORTED JAPANESE FOODS

Cites concerns over recent radiation findings in Japanese produce

Washington, DC— Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (CT-3), Ranking Member on the Labor, Education, Health, and Human Services Appropriations Subcommittee, sent a letter to Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, today expressing concern about potential health risks associated with food products imported from Japan in the wake of last week’s earthquake and tsunami damage to the Fukushima nuclear reactor.

The text of the letter appears below.


March 22, 2011

Margaret Hamburg, M.D.
Commissioner
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
10903 New Hampshire Ave
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

Dear Dr. Hamburg:

I am writing to express concern about the recent developments surrounding the potential health risks associated with imported food products from Japan. As you are aware, radiation has been found in spinach and milk at farms in Japan located near the damaged Fukushima nuclear reactor. Because the Food and Drug Administration does not track where food production facilities are located in other countries, I strongly urge the agency to act swiftly to set aside for radiological testing all food imports from Japan.

The World Health Organization has urged Japan to act quickly to ban food sales from areas surrounding the Fukushima nuclear plant if the food is found to contain excessive levels of radiation. As you know, and as the WHO reminded us, radiation in food can accumulate in the body and pose a greater risk to health than radioactive particles in the air. This is why it is critical that the FDA take every precaution necessary to ensure that any contaminated foods reach the U.S.

Last week, the FDA announced that it was working on steps to ensure that imported foods from Japan were safe, and developing a monitoring strategy that may include increased and targeted product sampling at the border. Regarding FDA’s announcement, please respond to the following questions:

The FDA has announced that the nuclear plant crisis in Japan has so far posed no risk to the U.S. food supply. How is the agency able to make this determination with such certainty? Is it based on radiological testing conducted at ports of entry?

The agency also indicated last week that it is closely monitoring food products from Japan as a precaution. What specific steps were taken to scrutinize the monitoring of these food products?

If radiological testing is being conducted by FDA, how is it being done? Are import inspectors capable of doing this at the ports of entry or are products being sent to FDA laboratories?

How is FDA coordinating with the Department of Homeland Security on this issue?

The FDA’s new risk-based screening system for imports, Predictive Risk-Based Evaluation for Dynamic Import Compliance Targeting (PREDICT), is supposed to assist entry reviewers in targeting higher-risk shipments for examination. Has PREDICT been programmed to flag all imports from Japan for radiological testing?

How would the budget cuts proposed in H.R. 1 impact FDA’s ability to scrutinize imported food products from Japan? Would imposing the cuts result in less radiological testing of food at ports of entry?

Thank you for your attention to this very critical issue. I look forward to the responses to these questions.

Sincerely,



ROSA L. DeLAURO

Ranking Member
House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies

Statement from Agriculture Secretary Vilsack on Tragedies in Japan, Effects on U.S. Food Imports

Statement from Agriculture Secretary Vilsack on Tragedies in Japan, Effects on U.S. Food Imports

WASHINGTON, March 18, 2011- Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today made the following statement on the recent tragedies in Japan:

"I know that there are many questions Americans might have about the terrible tragedies in Japan. I want to reassure the American public that at this time we have no reason to suggest that any of our meat, poultry, dairy or processed egg products are unsafe for consumption due to the recent events in Japan. Our food imports from Japan are quite limited. What we do import must meet the safety standards of this country. We monitor and inspect imports to insure compliance with those standards. Should any risk with imports arise, we have procedures and processes in place to identify problems and deal with them. While we continue to offer aid and assistance to the Japanese we do not intend to lose sight of our core mission which is make sure our food remains safe, abundant, and affordable."

Monday, March 21, 2011

Cornucopia: Industry Watchdog "Dumbfounded" by USDA’s Failure to Enforce Organic Law

Industry Watchdog "Dumbfounded"
by USDA’s Failure to Enforce Organic Law

USDA Continues Bush-era Policy of Allowing Unapproved Synthetic Additives

http://www.cornucopia.org/2011/03/industry-watchdog-dumbfounded-by-usda%E2%80%99s-failure-to-enforce-organic-law/
Cornucopia, WI—The Cornucopia Institute, one of the nation’s leading organic industry watchdogs, condemned the position of the United States Department of Agriculture that it will allow products containing unapproved synthetic additives to be labeled “organic” for an indefinite grace period.

The Cornucopia Institute had filed legal complaints against infant formula manufacturers and Dean Foods, manufacturer of Horizon dairy products, for adding unapproved additives: Martek Biosciences Corporation’s omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids (DHA/ARA), derived chemically from fermented algae and fungus, to foods with the organic label.

The Cornucopia Institute maintains, and the USDA reiterated in a compliance letter issued March 16, that these additives are illegal in organics. But the USDA also stated it would not take enforcement action at this time. The USDA’s compliance letter suggested that it would allow companies to continue adding the additives to organic foods during a phase-out period of unspecified length, despite its clear statement, in the same letter, that the additives were being used in organics due to an “incorrect” interpretation of the federal standards.

“Essentially, the USDA admitted once again in its letter that the DHA additives should never have been allowed in organics, and then goes on to state that they have chosen not to take enforcement action at this time,” said Charlotte Vallaeys, Farm and Food Policy Analyst with The Cornucopia Institute.

The Wisconsin-based Institute stated that it is meeting with its legal team to determine its next course of action in its efforts to ensure that foods bearing the “USDA Organic” label are produced in accordance with the federal organic standards.

"We hope the current NOP management moves quickly to implement their position, that adding unapproved additives to infant formula constitutes a violation of the organic standards," said attorney Gary Cox who has long represented The Cornucopia Institute in its oversight of the USDA.

Cornucopia states that it is likely to file a lawsuit against the USDA for its failure to carry out its congressionally-mandated duties in protecting the purity and safety of organic food.

“Federal law clearly states that synthetic additives must be approved by the USDA, through a formal petition process, assuring their safety before they can legally be added to foods with the organic label,” stated Vallaeys. “Martek’s Crypthecodinium cohnii and Schizochytrium oils (sources of DHA) and Mortierella alpina oil (a source of ARA) have never been approved, and the USDA has once again caved to industry lobbyists.”

The Cornucopia Institute is concerned with the USDA’s failure to enforce the organic standards regarding unapproved accessory nutrients, because the synthetic additives have been linked to many serious reported gastrointestinal problems in infants and young children.

Megan Golden of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, watched her newborn son suffer from serious vomiting and gastrointestinal illness from the day he was born and given formula with DHA and ARA. At age 9 weeks, she switched to formula without these additives, and his symptoms disappeared. “By the next day, no lie, my son was a completely different infant. He was comfortable, was not as agitated, and the throwing up had stopped. His gas pains went away. His stools became normal. And he could finally relax enough to sleep. I am thankful for that,” said Golden.

As of January 2009, more than a hundred similar adverse reaction reports have been filed with the Food and Drug Administration (a more recent open records request by The Cornucopia Institute is pending). Since few parents and healthcare professionals historically report the link between over-the-counter drugs or nutritional additives and adverse reactions to the FDA, scientists believe these reports constitute only the tip of the iceberg.

When USDA enforcement officials first became aware, in 2006, that infant formula manufacturers were adding unapproved additives to formula bearing the “USDA Organic” label, they recognized its illegality and sent an enforcement letter ordering them to take the unapproved additives out of organic infant formula.

Subsequently, discovered through a Freedom of Information Act request by The Cornucopia Institute, and reported in an investigative report by the Washington Post, corporate lobbyists convinced the former director of the USDA’s National Organic Program, Dr. Barbara Robinson, to overrule her staff's decision, and allow companies to market products with Martek’s unapproved algal-based and fungal-based additives.

The Cornucopia Institute has complained for years that this was an improper and illegal action by the agency. In 2010, the USDA, under the Obama administration, concurred with Cornucopia, stating in a public memorandum that this was an improper decision.

Unlike some essential nutrients (vitamins and minerals), unapproved additives like Martek’s DHA and ARA are not required by the FDA in foods, but are popular with food manufacturers because they are useful in trying to create a competitive marketing advantage.

The Food and Drug Administration just announced that it will conduct a study to determine if marketing claims by infant formula manufacturers, such as claims that DHA and ARA “support brain and eye development,” influence mothers’ feeding decisions and discourage breast-feeding.

Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition at New York University and author of Food Politics, states about DHA and ARA in infant formula: “Competition for market share explains why formula companies want to put distinctive nutrients in their formulas–especially nutrients considered ‘conditional.’ Even if the health benefits are minimal or questionable, they can be used in advertising.”

While they advertise these nutrients with questionable claims of benefits, companies do not share with consumers the process by which these nutrients are manufactured.

“Getting omega-3 fatty acids from natural sources like breast milk, or salmon, or flaxseed, and getting omega-3’s from a synthetic additive in infant formula or milk are two completely different things,” explains Vallaeys. “Companies like Martek don’t like consumers to know that these additives are often chemically extracted, fermented in genetically engineered feedstock, treated with harsh chemicals, deodorized and bleached. There’s a reason why so many consumers are turning to organic foods—to avoid these kinds of novel substances that masquerade as food,” she adds.

Additives like DHA and ARA are not required by the FDA in foods, including infant formula, because scientific data fails to document benefits to human health or development. Dr. Katherine Kennedy of the University College of London’s Institute of Child Health, along with several colleagues, wrote: “We contend this field of research has been driven to an extent by enthusiasm and vested interest.”

The British scientific panel also stated, “Although the vast majority of infant formulas now contain long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids [manufactured by Martek], the scientific evidence base for their addition is recognized by most investigators and key opinion leaders in the field to be weak.”

“After the USDA determined these materials were being illegally added to certified organic food, it's unconscionable that they would continue to drag their feet on enforcement even as more reports flow into the FDA on adverse health impacts,” says Kastel.

Consumers exhibit marketplace loyalty in the organic label, because it represents a rigorous third-party certification system of strict federal standards that prohibit synthetic inputs unless they have gone through a rigorous approval process. Organic activists are concerned that if the USDA fails to rigorously enforce the standards, allowing big business to make up their own rules, that consumer confidence in the label will be eroded.

Industry observers speculate that the USDA has dragged its feet on forcing the removal of these unapproved additives in order to allow time for the powerful pharmaceutical companies manufacturing infant formula (Abbott Laboratories and PBM Nutritionals, the private-label manufacturer for Wal-Mart and Hain-Celestial’s Earth’s Best brand) and the nation's largest milk bottler (Dean Foods) to petition the National Organic Standards Board, the expert citizen's body created by Congress, to approve the Martek materials, after the fact.

"This is more than just a question of whether a particular additive is risky and inappropriate for inclusion in organics," Kastel lamented. "The question is whether or not organics will remain a trusted last refuge for families who don't want to experiment with the long-term health of their children."

Earthjustice: “Roundup Ready” Alfalfa Will Increase Pesticide Use and Cause Grave Harm to Environment and Organic Industry

March 18, 2011 –

“Roundup Ready” Alfalfa Will Increase Pesticide Use and Cause Grave Harm to Environment and Organic Industry
USDA Failures Guarantee Transgenic Contamination, Creation of More Superweeds

Today, attorneys for the Center for Food Safety (CFS) and Earthjustice filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), arguing that the agency’s recent unrestricted approval of genetically engineered (GE), “Roundup Ready” Alfalfa was unlawful. The GE crop is engineered to be immune to the herbicide glyphosate, which Monsanto markets as Roundup. USDA data show that 93% of all the alfalfa planted by farmers in the U.S. is grown without the use of any herbicides. With the full deregulation of GE alfalfa, USDA estimates that up to 23 million more pounds of toxic herbicides will be released into the environment each year.

“USDA has once again failed to provide adequate oversight of a biotech crop,” said Andrew Kimbrell, Executive Director of the Center for Food Safety. “This reckless approval flies in the face of overwhelming evidence that GE alfalfa threatens the rights of farmers and consumers, as well as significant harm to the environment. APHIS has refused to apply and enforce the law and instead has chosen to bow to the wishes of the biotech industry.”

This is the second case challenging the legality of USDA’s handling of GE alfalfa. In 2007, in another case brought by CFS, a federal court ruled that the USDA’s approval of the engineered crop violated environmental laws by failing to analyze risks such as the contamination of conventional and organic alfalfa, the evolution of glyphosate-resistant weeds, and increased use of Roundup. The case resulted in USDA undertaking a court-ordered four-year study of GE alfalfa’s impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Remarkably, it marked the first time USDA had ever undertaken such a study, known as an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), in over 15 years of approving GE crops for commercial production. While USDA worked on the EIS, GE alfalfa remained unlawful to plant or sell, a ban that remained in place despite Monsanto appealing the case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Earthjustice attorney Paul Achitoff commented: “We expect Monsanto to force-feed people genetically engineered crops—that’s its business model. We hoped for better from the USDA, which has much broader responsibilities. GE alfalfa will greatly increase use of toxic chemicals from coast to coast, threatens the organic dairy industry, and will have farmers going back to Monsanto every year to buy its patented seed and Roundup.”

The plaintiffs include a diverse coalition of conventional and organic farmers, dairies and agricultural associations, and environmental and consumer groups: CFS, Beyond Pesticides, Cornucopia Institute, California Farmers Union, Dakota Resources Council, Geertson Seed Farms, National Family Farm Coalition, Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Alliance, Sierra Club, Trask Family Seeds and Western Organization of Resource Councils.

“We in the farm sector are dissatisfied but not surprised at the lack of courage from USDA to prohibit Roundup Ready alfalfa and defend family farmers,” said plaintiff farmer Pat Trask.

Known as the “queen of forages,” alfalfa is the key feedstock for the dairy industry. Organic dairies stand to lose their source of organic feed, a requirement for organic dairy, including milk and yogurt products. The organic sector is the most vibrant part of U.S. agriculture, now a 26 billion dollar a year industry and growing 20% annually.

“Approving the unrestricted planting of GE alfalfa is a blatant case of the USDA serving one form of agriculture at the expense of all others,” says plaintiff Ed Maltby, Executive Director of the Northeast Alliance of Organic Dairy Producers. “If this decision is not remedied, the result will be lost livelihoods for organic dairy farmers, loss of choice for farmers and consumers, and no transparency about GE contamination of our foods.”

Because alfalfa is pollinated by bees that can fly and cross-pollinate between fields and feral sources many miles apart, the engineered crop will contaminate natural alfalfa varieties. Roundup Ready alfalfa is the first engineered perennial crop, meaning it remains in the ground for 3-6 years and is widely prevalent in wild or feral form throughout America, further increasing the likelihood and extent of transgenic contamination.

“USDA’s review is inaccurate and completely failed to consider critical issues. The decision to deregulate Roundup Ready alfalfa opens the door to widespread transgenic contamination, costing farmers their markets, reputation and ability to grow natural varieties,” said plaintiff farmer Phil Geertson.

“We are an organic, grass-fed beef operation relying on alfalfa in pasture mix and for winter feed. GE alfalfa means contamination of all alfalfa seeds within a few years. Our options include giving up organic production at great revenue loss or finding another forage at great cost increase,” says organic beef producer Jim Munsch from Wisconsin.

Approval of Roundup Ready alfalfa will spur the glyphosate-resistant epidemic that is already regarded as one of the most serious challenges facing U.S. agriculture. Weeds evolve resistance to glyphosate just as bacteria evolve immunity to overused antibiotics. While other Roundup Ready crops spawned the epidemic, Roundup Ready alfalfa will exacerbate it by increasing the frequency and intensity of glyphosate use on millions of acres of cropland. Farmers respond to resistant weeds by applying more and more herbicides, soil-eroding tillage operations, and even hand-weeding on hundreds of thousands of acres. Such “superweeds” have expanded four-fold to infest over 10 million acres since just 2008, with some projecting 38 million acres by 2013. Alfalfa, the fourth most prevalent crop in the U.S., is grown on over 20 million acres, spanning every state.

“Alfalfa grows in dense stands that naturally suppress weeds, and so has traditionally been the one crop in farmers’ rotations that provides a much-needed break from the onslaught of toxic herbicides. Roundup Ready alfalfa will only foster still more resistant weeds, and thereby increase the pesticide dependence of U.S. agriculture beyond already unsustainable levels,” said Bill Freese, CFS Science Policy Analyst.

The latest USDA data show that less than 10 percent of alfalfa acres are sprayed with any herbicide, and consequently, GE alfalfa will dramatically increase the use of such chemicals across the country, with all of their attendant hazards to wildlife, plants, groundwater, and people.

Monday, March 14, 2011

New CAST Paper Assesses the Impact of Public Agricultural Research

March 14, 2011....Ames, Iowa. With global challenges mounting, it is a crucial time to examine the role research plays in our economic, social, and political well-being. In this new Commentary from the Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST), Investing in a Better Future through Public Agricultural Research, a team of respected scholars provides objective, science-based insights into the stateScience Lab of U.S. investments in public agricultural research. The authors look at important, timely issues:

● The rates of return for agricultural research

● The question of who should fund research and how

● The consequences if research lags during this time of economic

uncertainty
● The implications resulting from private research growing faster than public research
● The best methods for funding public agricultural research



Agricultural research is a low-cost source of future agricultural output, but advances in the frontiers of science are difficult and uncertain. The authors contend that, "With funding delays, world food prices will rise more rapidly than otherwise projected during the next 40 years."



Dr. Wallace Huffman, Distinguished Professor of Economics at Iowa State University, chaired the task force of notable scientists and researchers who drew from a wide base of information and included helpful charts and reference citations in their work. Their Commentary will be of interest to the Congress (for funding), the administration (for initiatives), and the public (for insight). Although the authors note that all research involves "uncertainty factors," they conclude with a positive assertion:



"Larger future investments in public agricultural research can be expected

to provide large social benefits relative to costs and to provide a better future for people of the United States and the world."



Dr. John Bonner, CAST Executive Vice President/CEO, concludes: "CAST delivers science and technology information regarding healthy and productive plants, animals, people, and the planet. We are pleased to contribute this excellent, frank assessment of where we are and where we need to be to establish and sustain the health and abundance of world agriculture."



The full text of Investing in a Better Future through Public Agricultural Research(Commentary QTA2011-1, 12 pp.) may be accessed free of charge on the CAST website at www.cast-science.org, along with many of CAST's other scientific publications. CAST is an international consortium of scientific and professional societies, nonprofit organizations, and companies, as well as individual members. It assembles, interprets, and communicates credible science-based information regionally, nationally, and internationally to legislators, regulators, policymakers, the media, the private sector, and the public.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Remarks as Prepared for Delivery: Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack Before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies

Remarks as Prepared for Delivery: Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack Before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies
WASHINGTON, March 10, 2011- Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today spoke before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies:
“As we meet, Congress is in the midst of debating a continuing resolution for 2011. As the President has made clear, the administration believes that the final product should embrace the principles both of shared sacrifice and shared opportunity, to do so carefully, and in a way that reflects our values.
“To prepare for this continuing resolution, I have already instructed my leadership team at USDA to prepare for a host of possibilities when it comes to future resources – and to know exactly what resources are available to them today. But it is also my hope that any funding proposals should provide USDA the time to appropriately manage any cuts so that we continue to be as effective as possible in serving our customers, the American people.
“As the continuing resolution has been debated, the Administration has demonstrated its commitment to reducing the deficit – taking a very close look at our budget to find spending cuts. USDA already showed our commitment to deficit reduction by providing $4 billion last year to help pay down the debt in negotiating an agreement with crop insurance companies.
“In total, the 2012 budget we are proposing before this subcommittee is $130 billion, a reduction of $3 billion below the 2011 annualized continuing resolution. For discretionary programs, our budget proposes $18.8 billion, a reduction of $1.3 billion below the 2011 level.
“In this budget, we are cutting programs not because we want to, but because we have to. American families have been forced to tighten their belts and government must do the same. We are promoting good government and streamlining agency operations in a host of programs. We are proposing to reduce or terminate selected programs. And, the budget fulfills the President’s pledge to completely eliminate earmarks. It looks to properly manage deficit reduction, while preserving the values that matter to Americans. We are working to do it responsibly by focusing limited resources on programs where we can achieve the greatest impact.
“We are also making investments to lay a foundation for a successful future for agriculture and for the American people. This budget includes targeted investments and program increases in key areas to support job creation and economic competitiveness. We will invest in research to spur innovation, promote exports, support renewable energy and conservation, and enhance critical infrastructure in rural communities.
“In rural America, we must continue to promote job growth as the economy continues to recover. This budget will better target our investments to high growth rural businesses, because the most important thing we can do to support job creation and thriving rural economies is to provide credit to entrepreneurs and communities. To help ensure rural communities have the basic infrastructure they need – and at no cost to the taxpayer – we are more than tripling our direct loan support to help communities build and repair hundreds of hospitals, libraries, and police and fire stations. We will also make critical investments in local and regional food systems, as they not only create jobs but also enhance income opportunities for producers.
“A nation-wide renewable energy industry will also help create the jobs of the future in rural America, while reducing our dependence on foreign oil, and risks to our environment. Our budget reflects our commitment to promoting the domestic production of renewable energy through continued investments in renewable energy programs and by focusing our loans to rural electric cooperatives on the development of clean burning low emission fossil fuel facilities and renewable energy deployment.
“Today, record agricultural exports are helping grow our economy – every billion dollars in increased exports supports 8,400 American jobs – and our budget includes resources directed at continuing that momentum.
“As the President has indicated, we have to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build, our global competitors. USDA's budget reflects a commitment to winning the future, to long-term growth and stability of our agricultural economy as well as our rural economy. Scientific research is essential for achieving these goals. To promote American innovation, new discoveries, and new industries, we continue to target and focus additional research dollars in key areas, like biofuel feedstocks, livestock and crop production and protection, ecosystem market foundations, and biotechnology.
“In this recovering economy, there are still many families in need. Our budget reflects the reality, fully funding the expected requirements for the Department's three major nutrition assistance programs – WIC, the National School Lunch Program, and SNAP. We also continue a strong but focused commitment on rural housing.
“Regardless of economic conditions, some things remain constant, like the need to ensure the safety of the American food supply. The budget focuses on two areas for improving food safety: the development of a public health information system that allows us to prevent problems, and a uniform incident command structure to allow us to respond more effectively to foodborne illness outbreaks that might be multiagency in scope.
“The agricultural economy is relatively strong and we anticipate that there will be very little need for counter-cyclical or loan deficiency programs.
“Unfortunately, not every segment of agriculture is experiencing good times. We are keeping an eye on livestock, dairy producers and specialty crop producers. We also want to ensure that intermediate-sized or medium-sized operations are succeeding, and to create opportunities for off-farm income that sustain many of these producers.
“To maintain a strong safety net for American agriculture, we fund our guaranteed and direct loan programs for ownership and operating loans, expand the crop insurance program, and adequately fund our disaster programs under the 2008 Farm Bill. And building on the crop insurance savings that we realized last year – which carry over into this year – new changes in catastrophic policies in terms of the premium assistance will net additional savings. Also, we again propose the direct payment reforms that would impact only about 2 percent of producers, and save $2.5 billion over 10 years.
“Overall, we propose cutting our Rural Development budget by $535 million, reflecting targeted reductions and eliminations of programs. We are proposing some tailoring of our housing programs, but still support a strong Guaranteed Single Family Loan Program. Our budget also recognizes that successful and effective rural economic development will occur on a regional basis. It proposes working through existing programs to fund regional pilot projects, strategic planning activities, and other investments to improve rural economies.
“There are some programs we propose eliminating entirely. The Guaranteed Operating Loan with Interest Assistance Program is relatively small and we think we can handle the operating loan needs of farmers without necessarily providing interest assistance. And a number of programs, like the Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations Program and the Watershed Rehabilitation Program, are eliminated simply because they are the responsibilities of other jurisdictions and are not large enough to really make a significant impact.
“In this budget, we remain committed to conservation and are proposing selected increases to emphasize targeted watershed-scale efforts and to improve the efficiency of our conservation program delivery. Overall, we anticipate a record number of acres enrolled in a variety of Farm Bill conservation programs.
“Inherent in this budget are also workforce reductions and administrative efficiencies that will allow us to more effectively manage our business through process improvement, the better use of IT, as well as taking a look at attrition, temporary workforces and the like, and ways of better managing our resources. And while many of our payment programs are operating at historic levels of accuracy, this budget continues to support efforts to reduce improper payments. We are also seeking to recover the cost of operating a number of programs by collecting user fees from those that directly benefit from the services being provided.
“Budgets are always difficult. They involve a variety of difficult choices and tradeoffs. This budget addresses the realities and critical challenges facing the Nation in a balanced way, and includes the targeted investments we need to make to support job growth as the economy recovers. I will be happy to answer your questions.”

Opening Statement of Chairman Frank D. Lucas Committee on Agriculture Public hearing to review the impact of EPA regulations on agriculture

Opening Statement of Chairman Frank D. Lucas
Committee on Agriculture
Public hearing to review the impact of EPA regulations on agriculture
March 10, 2011
As prepared for delivery
I would like to thank Administrator Jackson for being here today. I know there are quite a few committees in Congress that have invited you to appear before them and I expect your popularity as a witness will not diminish anytime soon.
There is a reason the top issue for nearly every member of the Agriculture Committee is related to the regulatory agenda of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The reason is simple: many members of this committee believe over the past two years the EPA has pursued an agenda seemingly absent of consideration for the consequences it would have on rural America and production agriculture. The agency is creating regulations and policies that are burdensome, overreaching, and that negatively affect jobs and rural economies.
Just a few examples:
• EPA’s proposed zero tolerance standard for pesticide spray drift;
• Initiating action to stiffen the current regulatory standard on farm dust, which would make tilling a field, operating a feedlot, or driving a farm vehicle nearly impossible; and
• An unprecedented, re-re-evaluation of the popular weed control product atrazine. The EPA in 2006 completed a 12-year review involving 6,000 studies and 80,000 public comments, yet one of the first orders of business of the Obama administration was to start over after an article appeared in The New York Times.
In many instances, the agency is ignoring Congressional intent and looks to be bullying Congress. Instead of simply administering the law, EPA challenges Congress to pass legislation that gives it more authority. And, if Congress doesn’t act, it will regulate anyway.
Farmers, ranchers, and foresters alike take great pride in their stewardship of the land. When a family’s livelihood depends on caring for natural resources, there is an undeniable economic incentive to adopt practices that enhance long term viability. While it may be popular among urbanites and suburbanites to blame farmers and ranchers for environmental concerns, I think that you can acknowledge that nobody cares more for the environment than those who derive their livelihoods from it.
Rural America’s economy is dependant on agriculture. EPA’s regulatory approach has unjustifiably increased the cost of doing business for America’s farmers and ranchers. If EPA continues down this path, the only choice for many farmers and ranchers will be to stop farming altogether.
While there are many government regulations that are seemingly good for the country, those regulations must be developed in a manner that is mindful of science and the economic consequences. There has been some recognition of this phenomenon as President Obama recently issued an executive order insuring that all regulations should have public participation, be based on science, and not prohibit growth, competitiveness and job creation. I look forward to finding out how the many recent EPA actions meet these criteria.
On a more positive note, I would like to take this time to acknowledge that there are recent examples where the EPA and this committee have been able to work cooperatively in an effort to remove unnecessary regulatory burdens. In particular, I would like to commend you for the technical assistance you have provided this committee in our efforts to clarify that the regulatory authority for pesticide applications in or near the waters of the United States falls under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and not the Clean Water Act (CWA).
I would also like to call your attention to our shared concerns regarding the seemingly dysfunctional consultation process for pesticides under the Endangered Species Act. This is an issue of great concern to the committee and we would hope to be able to work cooperatively with the EPA to address it.
I anticipate that nearly every member will wish to engage you in a discussion of specific areas of concern. It is my hope that this hearing will serve to open the door to a more cooperative working relationship with EPA generally and with you specifically.
I would like to end this opening statement with one last perception. Farmers and ranchers believe your agency is attacking them. They believe little credit is given to them for all the voluntary conservation activities that they have been engaged in for years. This committee is going to be an advocate for those farmers and I will tell you the committee will look at every proposed rule from your agency and ask three questions.
• Is the EPA following the law?
• Are you making regulatory decisions based on sound science and data?
• And are you conducting adequate cost-benefit analyses?
I thank you again for being here and look forward to the dialogue that develops today and in the future.

The Food Institute Announces April 2011 Webinar Schedule

The Food Institute Announces April 2011 Webinar Schedule

Next month, The Food Institute will host two informative webinars designed to address key issues impacting the food business. Each webinar is one hour in length and will offer those in attendance up-to-the-minute information, followed by a question & answer session.

Join us on Apr. 6th as we explore the role of Shopper Insights within the food industry. Shopper Insights have become a "must-have" decision-making tool for category managers, brand and retail marketers and merchandisers. Anyone intent on intensifying their efforts via more sophisticated segmentation channels and tighter collaboration with trade partners will benefit from the in-depth analysis of this market research study which will be shared with all registered attendees. For further information, or to register for this unique event, please visit http://www.foodinstitute.com/consumerinsights.cfm

And, on Apr. 12th, The Food Institute will examine Merger and Acquisition activity within the food sector. Two experts in the field will share their thoughts on past activity and offer strategies for the future. This webinar will explore key factors, which must be considered when determining whether a company is potentially appealing to buy, or sell. Analysis on expanding through acquisition, as well as economizing operations through consolidation, will be discussed. A legal expert will explain how the government - specifically the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission - evaluates each potential union and why, they may or may not be considered favorably. As an added bonus, those registered for this event will have the opportunity to purchase an electronic version of the "just-published" Food Business Mergers and Acquisitions book for a discounted price! Registration and additional information for this webinar can be found at http://www.foodinstitute.com/mergers2011.cfm

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Opening Statement by Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Collin C. Peterson Business Meeting to Consider H.R. 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011 March 9, 2011

Opening Statement by Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Collin C. Peterson
Business Meeting to Consider H.R. 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011
March 9, 2011

--As Prepared for Delivery--

“Good morning and thank you Chairman Lucas for holding today’s meeting.

“Today the Committee is considering H.R. 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act of 2011. The legislation will relieve producers from a potentially costly regulatory burden that would do little, if anything, to protect the environment.

“In 2006 the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a 2006 EPA rule which specifically exempted permitting of certain pesticide applications under the Clean Water Act. The court’s decision pre-empts the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, or FIFRA, by the Clean Water Act for the first time in the history of either statute.

“This was not the intent of Congress.

“The legislation we are considering today would restore congressional intent and address the court’s ruling by amending both the Clean Water Act and FIFRA to prohibit permits for pesticide application when pesticides are applied consistent with FIFRA.

“Clean Water Act permitting requirements would place a massive burden and responsibility on the states and the EPA. I think I speak for many of us when I say the last thing we need is more regulation coming from the EPA in this area.

“Last fall I introduced legislation to address this issue and I am pleased to see the Committee take up the bill before us today.

“For too long we’ve watched organizations use the courts to twist laws against American farmers and agricultural production. If we don’t work together to find a solution, producers will likely continue being told how to operate by lawyers and judges who don’t understand agriculture. The courts are not the place to decide agriculture policy. This legislation is a step in the right direction to address this problem.

“I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.”

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Deep Freeze, Soaring Gas Prices and Food Inflation Spur Vegetable Gardening in 2011, says Burpee

Deep Freeze, Soaring Gas Prices and Food Inflation Spur Vegetable Gardening in 2011, says Burpee

Warminster, PA – March 2011 – National garden company W. Atlee Burpee & Co. reports a surge in vegetable seed and plant sales that parallels the turmoil in the Middle East and the sharp rise in gas prices. “We’ve seen an unexpected flurry of orders come in over the last month,” says Burpee’s Chairman and CEO, George Ball.

Gas prices aren’t the only force compelling more Americans to save money with homegrown produce. Prices in the produce aisle are up significantly due to this winter’s record-shattering deep freeze in Mexico and the Southern U.S. that stunted the flowering and fruiting of tomato, pepper and cucumber plants on hundreds of produce farms.

“Given the deep dent grocery stores have put in consumers’ wallets, low-cost, healthy foods are even less affordable at a time when this country is most aware of its obesity epidemic,” Ball says. More Americans will turn to vegetable gardening in 2011 to offset both soaring food and gas prices, as they did when Burpee saw a 30 percent sales increase during the 2009 recession.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture forecasts the overall food inflation rate will increase by 3 percent. Along with top economists, Ball says this rate could be higher, adding more than $20 to the average monthly food bill for a family of four. Upon learning this news, Burpee reported in March 2011 that families could save as much as 90 percent in costs for these affected vegetables by growing them at home.

“A pack of Burpee red pepper seeds will produce about 20 pepper plants each, producing 15 peppers per plant,” Ball asks. “Would you rather pay $2.00 for one red pepper, or is it more sensible to grow $600 worth of red peppers in your own backyard for an investment of $4.95 in seeds?” Home grown tomatoes, cucumbers and even lettuce result in similar savings. “Saving money ‘growing your own’ will add value to not only your pocketbook, but also your taste buds and overall physical health. Gardening gets you—and your kids—outdoors.”

Monday, March 7, 2011

Tom Karst Daily


USDA Celebrates National School Breakfast Week

USDA Celebrates National School Breakfast Week

Highlights the Role of School Breakfast Programs in Building a Foundation for American Competiveness

WASHINGTON, March 7, 2011 – Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today marked National School Breakfast Week (March 7-12) by emphasizing the administration's commitment to provide schoolchildren with healthy, well-balanced meals to prepare them for a productive school day. Working with First Lady Michelle Obama's Let's Move! initiative, USDA is enhancing programs that will help to raise a healthier generation of students who will enter the classroom ready to concentrate, engage and learn.
"A nutritious breakfast will help our children learn better and have the energy needed for academic success," said Vilsack. "By ensuring all children have access to a healthy breakfast, we help lay the groundwork for a successful day and build a foundation for achievement that will help our kids win the future."
On Wednesday, Secretary Vilsack will speak to the School Nutrition Association, one of USDA's partner organizations that is working to raise awareness of the the School Breakfast Program (SBP). The SBP serves over 12 million children in 88,000 schools and residential child care institutions each day. The program offers children of all economic backgrounds breakfasts that are consistent with the latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Children from families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the Federal poverty level are eligible for free meals in the SBP. Those with higher incomes may be eligible for reduced priced meals.
"Participation in the School Breakfast Program is an important vehicle to meet the nutritional needs of children," said Kevin Concannon, USDA Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services. "Thanks to the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act signed into law by President Obama, we will be able to enroll many more children in our school feeding programs and greatly improve the quality of meals served in schools."
USDA recently announced that it will be investing $5.5 million in grants with approximately $2.5 million set aside to provide non-competitive grants (up to $50,000) to each State Agency that commits to specific strategies to increase the number of HealthierUS School Challenge (HUSSC) applications submitted for approval. Up to $350,000 may be requested to include both competitive and non-competitive grants.
The HealthierUS School Challenge is a key component of First Lady Michelle Obama's Let's Move! initiative to end childhood obesity within a generation. Schools participating in the challenge voluntarily adopt USDA standards for food they serve at their schools, agree to provide nutrition education and provide opportunities for physical activity.
Improving child nutrition is the focal point of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act signed by President Obama in December 2010. The legislation authorizes USDA'S child nutrition programs, including the National School Lunch, School Breakfast, Summer Food Service Program, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children. The Act allows USDA, for the first time in over 30 years, the chance to make real reforms to the school lunch and breakfast programs by improving the critical nutrition and hunger safety net for millions of children, and help a new generation win the future by having healthier lives. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act is the legislative centerpiece of First Lady Michelle Obama's Let's Move! initiative.
USDA's Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) oversees the administration of 15 nutrition assistance programs, including the school meals programs that touch the lives of one in four Americans over the course of a year. These programs work in concert to form a national safety net against hunger. Visit www.fns.usda.gov for information about FNS and nutrition assistance programs

Sunday, March 6, 2011

E. coli O157:H7 Cases Linked to Hazelnuts

E. coli O157:H7 Cases Linked to Hazelnuts

FDA: E. coli O157:H7 cases linked to hazelnuts
DeFranco & Sons voluntarily recalling in-shell hazelnuts and mixed-nut products in bulk and bags

Fast Facts

* DeFranco & Sons of Los Angeles, Calif. is voluntarily recalling bulk and consumer-packaged in-shell hazelnuts and mixed-nut products containing in-shell hazelnuts.
* The recalled products are linked to seven cases of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and may cause serious illness.
* Consumers who have purchased bulk in-shell hazelnuts or mixed-nut products containing in-shell hazelnuts should check with the retailer to determine if they are subject to the recall, or throw the nuts away.


What is the Problem?
DeFranco & Sons is voluntarily recalling in-shell hazelnuts, also called filberts, and mixed nuts containing in-shell hazelnuts that have been linked to seven cases of E. coli O157:H7 in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. These nuts were distributed nationwide and to Canada Nov. 2 to Dec. 22, 2010. The in-shell hazelnuts may have been sold in 2-pound and 4-pound packages of mixed nuts, 1-pound packages containing only in-shell hazelnuts or in open bins of nuts in grocery stores.

What are the Symptoms of Illness/Injury?
Most people infected with E. coli O157:H7 develop diarrhea (often bloody) and abdominal cramps 2-8 days (3-4 days, on average) after swallowing the organism, but some illnesses last longer and are more severe. Infection is usually diagnosed by stool sample culture. While most people recover within a week, some develop a severe infection. A type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) can begin as the diarrhea is improving; this can occur among persons of any age but is most common in children under 5 years old and the elderly. Signs and symptoms of HUS may include: fever, abdominal pain, pale skin tone, fatigue and irritability, small, unexplained bruises or bleeding from the nose and mouth, decreased urination and swelling of the face, hands, feet, or entire body. Persons who experience these symptoms and believe they are at risk for HUS should seek emergency medical care immediately.

Who is at Risk?
E. coli O157:H7 can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people and others with weakened immune systems.

What Do Consumers Need To Do?
Don’t eat recalled in-shell hazelnuts and mixed nuts containing in-shell hazelnuts. Consumers are advised to follow recall instructions and check with the retailer to see if the bulk nuts they purchased are among those being recalled, or throw the product away. Consumers should check the 1-pound, 2 pound and 4-pound products to see if the brand name and “Sell by Date” matches those listed below.

What Does the Product Look Like?
DeFranco & Sons received the in-shell hazelnuts from other suppliers and growers. In some cases, the in-shell hazelnuts were mixed and packaged with other nuts. The products were subsequently distributed nationwide and to Canada. The affected products listed below were distributed between Nov. 2, 2010 and Dec. 22, 2010.


Brand

Size

Product

Sell By Date

UPC
Sunripe

1 lb

Large Hazelnuts

6/30/11

070533 000167
Sunripe

1 lb

Mixed Nuts

6/30/11

070533 000143
Sunripe

2 lbs

Mixed nuts

6/30/11

070533 001003
None – (Sold as “Season’s Greetings” Gift Pack)

4 lbs

Mixed Nuts

6/30/11

070533 101024
Sunripe

50 lbs

Imperial Mixed Nuts

None

None
Sunripe

50 lbs

Supreme Mixed Nuts

None

None
George Packing

50 lbs

Hazelnuts

Not available. Recall applies only the products distributed by DeFranco and Sons between 11/2/10 to 12/22/10.

The 50-pound bags of in-shell hazelnuts or mixed nuts with in-shell hazelnuts may have been repacked into smaller packages by other firms or sold from bulk containers to consumers.

Where is it Distributed?
The affected nuts may have been sold by retailers nationwide and in Canada.

What is Being Done about the Problem?
The FDA became of aware of the problem in late February and is actively working with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and public health and agricultural agencies in those states where illnesses have occurred to investigate the source of the contamination. The investigation is still ongoing. The FDA is also working with state authorities to take appropriate action to address any product that may be remaining on the market. The FDA has also shared information with Canadian authorities about the problem.

Who Should be Contacted?
Consumers with questions about this recall should contact DeFranco & Sons at 1-800-993-3992 Monday through Friday from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. Pacific time.

The FDA encourages consumers with questions about nut safety to call 1-888-SAFEFOOD.

The information in this press release reflects the FDA’s best efforts to communicate what it has learned from the distributer and the state and local public health agencies involved in the investigation. The agency will update this page as more information becomes available.


For more information:

* DeFranco & Sons press release

http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm245795.htm

* CDC press release

http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2011/hazelnuts0157/index.html

* California Department of Public Health

http://www.cdph.ca.gov/Pages/NR11-014.aspx

* Minnesota Department of Health press release

http://www.health.state.mn.us/news/pressrel/2011/ecoli030411.html

* Wisconsin Department of Health Services

http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/News/PressReleases/2011/030411.htm

* FoodSafety.gov

www.foodsafety.gov

* CDC: Information about E. coli

http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/

Friday, March 4, 2011

REPORT RELEASED BY VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA SHOWS LOOMING THREAT FOR SENIOR CARE

REPORT RELEASED BY VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA
SHOWS LOOMING THREAT FOR SENIOR CARE
Families Facing Financial Crisis in Caring for Family Members

ALEXANDRIA, Va., March 4, 2011 – With the country still recovering from the economic downturn, Volunteers of America has released an eye-opening study on the state of aging in the U.S. The collision of the economy, the health care crisis and a large population of aging Americans has put many families in or near financial crisis.

According to the report, a “plurality of caregivers say the economy has made it more difficult to provide care to a family member. Few—roughly one in 10—are paid for the care they provide.” More than 46 percent report that the economy has made it harder to be able to provide care. Three quarters of caregivers state that the person to whom they provide care is 70 years or older.

“We have a potential catastrophe looming with the collision of a significant, and growing, aging population, the economic downturn, and the health care crisis,” stated Rosemarie Rae, executive vice president with Volunteers of America.

The first baby boomers will reach 65 next year, with more than 71.5 million Americans in the 65 or older age bracket by 2030. This will be the largest senior population in U.S. history and almost double the approximately 37 million seniors today. “This is a large, emerging crisis in America,” added Rae.

“Medicare already pays out more in benefits than it brings in and will be insolvent by 2017,” Rae continued. “Social Security will pay out more than it collects beginning in 2016 and the system as a whole will be insolvent by 2037.” Medicaid statistics are equally alarming. In order to qualify, most people must bankrupt themselves before they can receive long-term care coverage.

“We are hopeful that healthcare reform will begin to shape this discussion and mitigate the negative impacts of the current system,” Rae said.

The Volunteers of America study also reported that an overwhelming majority—97 percent of women and 94 percent of men—believe that the elderly should be allowed to age at home, if they want to. Almost half of the women surveyed expect that they will be called upon to provide care to an older family member at some point in the future and more than 54 percent stated that it is not likely that they will be able to care for the family member.

A majority of those interviewed reported that they were unable to make financial, career or family sacrifices in order to care for an older family member. More than 65 percent stated that they would be unable to take time off of work to care for an elderly loved one, and 86 percent of women interviewed and 81 percent of men agreed that better workplace policies are needed to meet family obligations to help aging family members.

Only about half of those interviewed have done any preparation for their own aging. In addition to not having financial stability, many have not entered into discussions with family members about how they should be cared for. Most have not talked to their doctor about aging issues and more than 50 percent do not have a power of attorney and/or will in place.

Volunteers of America has spent more than a century anticipating and adapting to the needs of the population’s most vulnerable citizens. In preparation for the growing health care demands associated with an unprecedented rising number of aging individuals, Volunteers of America commissioned a study (conducted by Lake Research/American Viewpoint) to determine the most challenging issues facing Americans regarding care giving and aging. The findings from the study have validated Volunteers of America’s Aging with OptionsTM initiative, which provides an integrated care and support system for older Americans and their caregivers.

Volunteers of America identified four primary challenge areas faced by aging women and their caretakers: economic issues, desire for independence, workplace flexibility and lack of preparation.

The report is available at http://www.volunteersofamerica.org/Media-Center/News-Events/Americas-Caregiving-and-Aging-Challenges.aspx.

Vilsack: Farming a way forward to economic recovery

Farming a way forward to economic recovery
By Thomas J. Vilsack, special to the Times
March 3, 2011

As the U.S. and global economies work to recover from the worst recession in decades, American agriculture is helping to lead our nation's recovery by shattering trade records, creating jobs here at home and ensuring affordable food for families.
Today I am in Tampa to talk with American farmers. Thanks to one of the most productive eras in history for U.S. agriculture and a reputation for quality products, farmers and ranchers are racking up record sales for U.S. farm goods abroad and looking forward to some of the best net incomes in decades. U.S. agricultural exports for 2011 are on course to shatter previous records — and enjoy a record $47.5 billion surplus. In the past five years, Florida farm exports grew $1 billion, reaching $2.9 billion in 2010 and growing.
What does this good news mean for those not engaged in farming or ranching? For one, it means cheaper grocery bills for U.S. families.
American families spend less at the grocery store compared with consumers in much of the rest of the world, and that allows our families to spend more of their income on a home, save for retirement or fund their child's college education. Even with small increases in food prices this year, we'll keep more money in our pockets than our competitors because our country produces 86 percent of the food Americans buy and consume. You can thank a farmer or rancher for that peace of mind.
Agriculture also means jobs for Americans: one in 12 nationwide and one in 23 here in Florida. And exports create additional jobs: Every $1 billion in farm exports supports roughly 8,000 jobs in the United States in agriculture and related industries such as transportation, storage and food packaging. This year, exports will support more than a million such jobs.
Florida, which ranks 17th in state-produced farm exports, wins on two fronts: in jobs directly attributed to farming and ranching, as well as jobs related to exports. The farm commodities passing through ports in Tampa and Miami on their way to Latin America support paychecks for thousands of Floridians.
I know Florida agriculture has a big part to play in the story of our nation's economic resurgence and long-term strength. Last summer, I traveled to Plant City, where I toured Castillo Farms. Hilda and Fidel Castillo immigrated to the Plant City area from Mexico a few decades ago to pick fruits and vegetables on area farms.
Over time, they were able to lease an acre or two of land to farm for themselves, scrimping and saving and working with local USDA employees for advice and support. Today, the Castillos produce cantaloupe, strawberries and peppers on 40 acres of their own land and employ a few dozen workers. I left their farm proud to lead a department that promotes policies that help the Castillos' story to be repeated — and celebrated — around the nation.
In the years ahead, USDA will work harder than ever to give businesses such as the Castillos' even greater opportunities to grow. At President Obama's direction, USDA has focused on building a robust future for the U.S. economy and opening new markets at home and abroad for agricultural producers. We want famers such as the Castillos to know that opportunities exist beyond our shores to grow their businesses. Today, only 1 percent of U.S. companies export, and yet 95 percent of the world's consumers live outside the borders of the United States. We can do better to reach those consumers.
Smart trade deals that increase exports, support job creation, and bolster the American economy can help build for our future. Right now, the Obama administration is working to move forward on proposed U.S. trade agreements with South Korea, then Panama and Colombia — nations with 100 million consumers. Successful approval would bring billions of dollars to U.S. agriculture and immediate benefits to Florida by eliminating tariffs on a range of Florida agricultural products.
Since 2009, when I became Agriculture Secretary, USDA officials have negotiated hard to open markets for U.S. farm goods. Thanks to the president's National Export Initiative, which challenged U.S. businesses to double all exports by the end of 2014, USDA is now reaching out to producers and agribusinesses, especially small- and medium-sized enterprises, with information about how to tackle the export market.
Whether it means directly connecting U.S. companies and trade groups with foreign customers or advocating more forcefully for their interests with other governments, we are working to expand economic opportunities for Americans.
For decades, U.S. agriculture has helped to feed a hungry world, added jobs to our economy and reduced our trade deficit. As we embark on building a stronger America for the future, don't be surprised that American farmers and ranchers are helping to lead the way

USApple Applauds U.S.-Mexico Trucking Agreement A Clear Path to Resolution Promises End to 20% Apple Tariff

USApple Applauds U.S.-Mexico Trucking Agreement
A Clear Path to Resolution Promises End to 20% Apple Tariff


VIENNA, VA – The U.S. Apple Association (USApple) applauds the governments of the U.S. and Mexico today for announcing that they have reached an agreement in principle to resolve a long-standing cross-border trucking dispute. Mexico has committed to end its 20% import duty faced by U.S. apple exports into Mexico when the deal is implemented.

“This agreement is good news for the apple industry,” said Nancy Foster, USApple’s president and CEO. “A permanent solution is needed that provides certainty for our long-term trading relationship with Mexico,” she continued. “U.S. apple growers urge the U.S. and Mexico to reach final agreement on the few remaining technical issues so that a deal can be implemented as soon as possible.”

A U.S.-Mexico cross-border trucking pilot program was in effect until March 2009 when it was terminated by the U.S. Congress at the urging of organized labor. As a result, the U.S. was in violation of its obligations under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Consequently, Mexico exercised its NAFTA rights to impose retaliatory tariffs on $2.4 billion worth of U.S. manufactured and agricultural exports, including apples.

“American apple growers urge Congress to support resolution of this long-standing trucking dispute so that they can regain duty-free market access into Mexico, their largest export market,” urged Foster.

Last year, Mexico imported 11.5 million boxes (bushels) of fresh U.S. apples, worth $207 million. This represents 27.5% of total U.S. apple export value. More than $1 out of every $3 in U.S. apple revenue comes from exports.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Group of Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Eliminate Duplicative Permit Requirement for Pesticide Applications

Group of Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Eliminate
Duplicative Permit Requirement for Pesticide Applications
Congressional action necessary to prevent significant cost to economy
WASHINGTON – Today, Reps. Bob Gibbs (R-OH), Jean Schmidt (R-OH), and Joe Baca (D-CA) introduced H.R. 872, a bipartisan bill to reduce the regulatory burdens posed by the case National Cotton Council v. EPA (6th Cir. 2009). Joining in this effort as original cosponsors were House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas (R-OK), as well as Reps. Collin Peterson (D-MN), John Mica (R-FL), and Mike Simpson (R-ID).
Under the court ruling, pesticide users, which include farmers, ranchers, forest managers, state agencies, city and county municipalities, mosquito control districts, and water districts, among others would have to obtain a duplicative permit under the Clean Water Act (CWA) for the use of pesticides. Pesticide applications are already highly regulated under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
The order of the court goes into effect on April 9, 2011. At that time, pesticide applications not covered by a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit are subject to a fine of up to $37,500 per day per violation. In addition to the cost of compliance, pesticide users will be subject to an increased risk of litigation under the citizen suit provision of the CWA.
The legislation would amend FIFRA and the CWA to clarify Congressional intent and eliminate the requirement of a NPDES permit for the use of FIFRA-registered pesticides.
"This legislation will prevent the single greatest expansion of the permitting process in the history of the Clean Water Act program. Unless Congress acts, hundreds of thousands of farmers, foresters, public health officials and others face either new regulatory costs or the threat of lawsuits and exorbitant fines." - Rep. Bob Gibbs, Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee's Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment
"This order will cost jobs and further strain state and federal budget crises. It is critically important that we get this to the President's desk by April 9." - Rep. Jean Schmidt, Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee's Subcommittee on Nutrition and Horticulture
"If left unchanged, the misguided ruling in the National Cotton Council v. EPA decision may lead to devastating consequences for the public health of Americans and the economic well-being of state regulating agencies, agricultural producers, and small businesses. I am pleased to work with my colleagues on this bipartisan measure, which ensures FIFRA remains the standard for pesticide regulation and continues to protect the health and safety of our families and communities." - Rep Joe Baca, Ranking Member of the House Agriculture Committee's Subcommittee on Nutrition and Horticulture
"Today we've introduced legislation to eliminate an unnecessary and duplicative regulatory burden imposed by an uninformed court decision. I encourage my colleagues to work together for swift passage before the April 9 deadline." - Rep. Frank Lucas, Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee
“Congress never intended for farmers and ranchers to meet additional permit requirements for pesticide applications under FIFRA. The last thing producers need is more regulation and this bill will relieve producers from meeting a costly regulatory burden that would have little to no environmental benefit.” - Rep. Collin Peterson, Ranking Member of the House Agriculture Committee
"These duplicative regulations would unnecessarily burden our small businesses, farmers, state and local governments, and others. I commend Chairman Gibbs for helping to spearhead this common sense legislative effort to reign in the out of control federal regulatory policies that weigh down our economy and stifle job creation.” - Rep. John Mica, Chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
“Duplicative and unnecessary federal regulations make it that much harder for farmers and other water users to survive in difficult economic times. It is imperative that we act quickly to address this problem.” - Rep. Mike Simpson, Chairman of the House Interior and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee

First Lady Michelle Obama, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan and U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack Work with Education Stakeholders to Increase Participation in the HealthierUS School Challenge and Advance Goals of the First Lady’s Lets Move! Initiative

First Lady Michelle Obama, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan and U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack Work with Education Stakeholders to Increase Participation in the HealthierUS School Challenge and Advance Goals of the First Lady’s Lets Move! Initiative

WASHINGTON, March 2, 2011- First Lady Michelle Obama, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack spoke to education stakeholders on a conference call today to discuss advancing the Let’s Move! initiative goal of doubling the number of schools participating in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) HealthierUS School Challenge Program. Education stakeholders from across the country were invited to participate, including representatives from the American Association of School Administrators, National School Boards Association, National Association of State Boards of Education, Council of the Great City Schools, National Parent Teacher Association, the School Nutrition Association, the National Association of Elementary School Principals, the National Association of Secondary School Principals, the National Association of School Nurses, the National Association for Educating Young Children, and the Association for School Business Officials International.

During the call, education stakeholders were urged to help generate additional participation in the challenge and support the Let’s Move! initiative by promoting the application guidance provided in USDA’s online toolkit. Every year, schools participating in the National School Lunch Program are encouraged to submit an application to the HealthierUS School Challenge Program, organized by USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service. The challenge is a voluntary initiative that recognizes and rewards schools that promote healthy environments for students through nutrition and physical activity programs. In addition, the challenge aims to improve the quality of food served in schools, provide students with nutrition education, physical education and opportunities for physical activity.

“The HealthierUS School Challenge is a great way for schools to create healthier environments for kids,” First Lady Michelle Obama said. “It sets concrete goals for providing more nutritious school food, regular physical activity and sound nutrition education to help kids make better choices. And right now, we’re working to double the number of schools in the HealthierUS School Challenge. We’re not going to stop until we’ve solved the problem of childhood obesity once and for all. We’re not going to stop until we know that our schools and our educators have everything they need to give our kids the healthy futures they deserve.”

“Students do better in schools when they have a balanced diet and regular exercise,” Secretary Duncan said. “To make sure we’re preparing students in every way possible to be successful in school, we need to teach them how a healthy lifestyle can effectively impact their ability to learn now, in college and throughout their careers. The HealthierUS School Challenge is a great opportunity for administrators, school leaders, teachers and student to share their hard work toward promoting nutrition and physical education, and encourage other schools to take on the challenge.”

“We know that to win the future, we have to win the race to educate our children and that means that our kids must have access to nutritious meals and healthy lifestyles,” Secretary Vilsack said. “Over the past year, individuals and organizations around the country have come together to improve school meals and get kids active, helping us make progress toward certifying 1,250 schools in the HealthierUS School Challenge. It is critical that we continue to work together to encourage schools to become part of this initiative so we can reward schools that do an exceptional job promoting meal participation, meal quality, nutrition education and physical activity.”

The HealthierUS School Challenge Program helps advance the goals of the First Lady’s Let’s Move!initiative by encouraging, supporting and pursuing solutions to combat childhood obesity. Many children consume as many as half of their daily calories at school. With more than 31 million children participating in the National School Lunch Program and more than 11 million participating in the National School Breakfast Program, good nutrition at school is more important than ever. Over the course of the current school year, USDA has worked with partners in the private sector and education community to double the number of schools that meet the HealthierUS School Challenge and add 1,000 schools per year over the next two years.

To learn more about the HealthierUS School Challenge Program and to access the online application, visit: http://www.letsmove.gov/chefs-step-2.php. To access the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s application kit, visit http://teamnutrition.usda.gov/Resources/healthierchallengeapplicationkit.html

TIE ON YOUR APRON AND GET READY TO BAKE TO HELP END CHILDHOOD HUNGER IN AMERICA

TIE ON YOUR APRON AND GET READY TO BAKE
TO HELP END CHILDHOOD HUNGER IN AMERICA
Share Our Strength launches Eighth Annual Great American Bake Sale® March 1
National Challenge Set for May 13-15, 2011

Washington, D.C. (March 1, 2011) – Share Our Strength® announces its Eighth Annual Great American Bake Sale®, presented by Domino® Sugar, C&H® Sugar and Duncan Hines®, officially kicked off nationwide on March 1, 2011. Great American Bake Sale is a national campaign that encourages Americans to hold bake sales in their communities to raise funds for Share Our Strength, the leading organization ending childhood hunger in America.

Share Our Strength is asking families, kids, neighbors, businesses, churches and even whole towns to hold bake sales to help raise funds to support Share Our Strength’s No Kid Hungry® Campaign to end childhood hunger in America by 2015. Through this campaign, Share Our Strength ensures that children in need are enrolled in federal nutrition programs like school lunch and breakfast; invests in community organizations that help connect kids with the food they need; teaches at-risk families how to cook healthy, affordable meals; and builds public-private partnerships to end child hunger nationally, and at the state and city levels. Since 2003, 1.7 million people have participated in the Great American Bake Sale, and raised more than $6 million.

Bake sales, which are happening throughout the country all year long, empower individuals, including children, to make a difference in their own communities and become part of the solution. They can be held in a variety of venues, from schools to community centers, to churches or businesses. To find a bake sale in your area or to get information on hosting a bake sale, visit greatamericanbakesale.org.

In addition to the Annual Great American Bake Sale, Americans are invited to join the Great American Bake Sale National Challenge May 13-15, 2011. In its second year, the Challenge is a three-day call to action to hold as many bake sales as possible in as many states as possible.

“Hunger affects more than 17 million kids in the United States. That is nearly 1 in 4,” says Sandra Lee, national spokesperson. “Share Our Strength’s Great American Bake Sale is a great way for people to give back to their communities while having fun. By hosting bake sales, individuals are helping feed children who struggle with hunger.”

Lee, popular star of Food Network’s “Semi-Homemade Cooking with Sandra Lee” and a premier lifestyle and food expert, faced hunger as a child, she along with her four younger siblings, relied on federal feeding programs like food stamps. In 2008, Lee joined Great American Bake Sale as the campaign’s national spokesperson. Lee will publish a new cookbook entitled Semi-Homemade Bake Sale, and will donate 25 percent of proceeds to Share Our Strength’s Great American Bake Sale.



Great American Bake Sale is supported by Chicago Metallic™, official bakeware partner, Food Network, national television partner, Family Circle, national print partner, and Solo®, an official baking ingredient partner.

Register your bake sale or learn more at GreatAmericanBakesale.org.

Stabenow to EPA: Extend the stay

March 2, 2011

The Honorable Lisa Jackson
Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460


Dear Administrator Jackson:

I write to respectfully request that you ask the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to extend, by nine months, the two-year stay it granted in National Cotton Council v. EPA. I believe that an extension of the stay – which is set to expire on April 9, 2011 – is necessary to prevent widespread confusion regarding Clean Water Act (CWA) permitting obligations that could arise for hundreds of thousands of regulated entities nationwide, including farms and timberlands. It is my understanding that neither EPA nor States with delegated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs are sufficiently prepared to implement the permitting requirements. Providing additional time will give the relevant regulatory agencies enough time to properly implement the Court’s 2009 ruling, which made applications of aquatic pesticides subject to NPDES permitting requirements.

An extension of the stay would also provide Congress with an opportunity to gain a better understanding of how EPA’s implementation of the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) protects human health and the environment, including the quality of water resources. Gaining additional insight into FIFRA’s protection for waters would also be particularly relevant to a review of EPA’s preparation of the Pesticide General Permit under the CWA.

Because FIFRA is the primary statute governing pesticide use, I would like to obtain additional information regarding EPA’s implementation of the statue to determine the effectiveness of protection for human health and the environment in the case of pesticide applications on or near water.

• In implementing its statutory mandate, what efforts does EPA take to ensure that FIFRA-registered pesticides, particularly those for aquatic use, do not adversely affect the environment and human health?

• Describe the steps that EPA takes to assess risks and identify controls to mitigate risks.

• What steps does EPA take to collect information on incidents related to pesticide use? What does the Agency do with that information?

• How do EPA and the States, through their delegated authority, ensure that pesticide applicators adhere to the requirements of FIFRA that protect human health and the environment?

I thank you for your attention to these matters, and I look forward to your response to the issues raised in this letter.

Sincerely,



Debbie Stabenow
United States Senator