House Ag nutrition subcommittee amendments
The House Agriculture Committee has reported on the amendments passed by the nutrition subcommittee.
Note the new name for Food Stamps. During the Web broadcast of the hearing one member argued against a new name for the program. He said it took years to build the "Food Stamps" brand to the public, and worried that changing the name to a new acronym may create a disconnect between the public and the program. He was the only dissent, however, and the new name - Secure Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - passed with ease.
From the news release:
Chairman Baca and Ranking Member Bonner's amendment to rename the Food Stamp Program as the "Secure Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program."
. Congressman Steve Kagen's amendment to establish a competitive grant program to develop and test solutions to the rising rate of obesity in the U.S. and to strengthen efforts to integrate nutrition education into the Food Stamp Program.
. Chairman Baca and Congressman Boustany's amendment to express the findings of Congress that Food Stamp Nutrition Education plays an essential role in dietary practices of low income Americans by providing public health and educational resources and to encourage State Food Stamp programs to use effective strategies to implement Food Stamp Nutrition Education.. The Amendment also directs USDA to support and encourage Food Stamp Nutrition Education and to promote the coordination of State Food Stamp Nutrition Education with other federally funded public health programs.
. Chairman Joe Baca's amendment to express the findings of Congress that products purchased for school lunch programs should meet the current requirements for the Federal Buy American guidelines.
TK: Remember you can access the House Ag Committee Web site on the farm bill here.
posted by Tom Karst @ 5:09 PM
2 Comments:
HOUSE SUBCOMMITEE MARKUP PROVIDES HOPE FOR MILLIONS OF HUNGRY AMERICANS
The $5 Billion Nutrition Proposal Strengthens Federal Nutrition Programs
CHICAGO, June 15, 2007—The House Subcommittee on Nutrition completed a markup yesterday that proposes to increase spending under the Nutrition Title of the 2007 Farm Bill by an estimated $5 billion over five years. This funding is contingent upon offsets, but if provided, would strengthen The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), the Food Stamp Program and the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP).
“This markup is a critical step forward in securing a strong nutrition title in the 2007 Farm Bill Reauthorization,” said Vicki Escarra, president and chief executive officer of America’s Second Harvest—The Nation’s Food Bank Network. “We commend the Subcommittee, particularly Chairman Baca and Ranking Member Bonner, for their leadership in moving us one step closer to feeding more hungry Americans.”
Highlights in the proposed legislation include: (1.) $250 million for commodity purchases for The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP); (2.) an increase to $100 million in the authorization for the direct and indirect costs of processing, storing, transporting and distributing TEFAP commodities; (3.) reauthorizing the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP); establishing the same income eligibility standards for the elderly and as for mothers and children.
“The proposal includes many provisions that are essential to helping our food banks nationwide, but we are hopeful that the House and Senate Agriculture Committees will be able to secure sufficient funding for these improvements without doing harm to other important programs serving the poor and hungry of this nation,” said Escarra. “Our food banks are facing enormous challenges each day with dramatically increasing costs to transport food to people in need, and we believe this must be addressed in the Farm Bill Reauthorization this year. A small amount of funding to help with transporting highly perishable products could yield benefits far beyond the cost for thousands of low-income families and individuals in need of healthy foods.”
America’s Second Harvest is advocating for a “Food for the Hungry” transportation grant program that would help facilitate the procurement and transportation of highly perishable foods, such as produce and protein, for low-income families and individuals. These are among the food items most in need at food banks nationwide, and most needed in the diets of poor Americans. Our food banks also support provisions in the bill that will expand access and benefits for food stamp recipients.
“We are pleased that food stamp improvements are in the House subcommittee proposal because we see millions of recipients coming to us in the third week of every month when their food stamps run out. And, we see those who cannot get enough to eat but are ineligible for food stamps because of outdated income deductions and exclusions,” said Escarra.
Specifics food stamp improvements include increasing the standard deduction for households and indexing it for inflation, lifting the cap on maximum deductions for child care and excluding combat-related military pay, education savings accounts and retirement accounts from countable resources when applying for the Food Stamp Program. The House subcommittee bill also would rename the Food Stamp Program the “Secure Nutrition Access Program” (SNAP).
“As the largest charitable hunger-relief organization in the United States, our Network serves more than 25 million Americans, including 9 million children and nearly 3 million seniors, each year,” said Escarra. “We are working to end hunger in America, but we can not do it alone. The Federal Government has an important leadership and resource role. Each dollar it invests in our nutrition programs offers an enormous return when it spurs the local economy and helps food banks and charitable agencies multiply this with private and corporate donations. We cannot continue to allow one in ten Americans to be hungry or at risk of hunger. This Farm Bill reauthorization can help pave the way to a food secure nation, and it is long past time to accomplish this worthy goal.”
Secure Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; better, but still seems a bit long winded gov-speak. Why not just, Nutrition Assistance Program?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home