Fresh Produce Discussion Blog

Created by The Packer's National Editor Tom Karst

Thursday, June 7, 2007

Section by section analysis

Released yesterday, here is a section by section analysis from the House Ag Committee on the draft mark of the subcommittee on horticulture and organic produce:


Beside the language on specialty crop block grants, the draft explicitly authorizes the use of USDA marketing orders for food safety purposes. The subcommittee also wants to move border inspectors back to the USDA from the CBP.



It was somewhat surprising to see amendments in the draft mark on commodity specific measures like clementine and avocado import standards and mushroom promotion order changes. One lobbyist said he expected amendments like those eventually, but he thought everyone was focused on the big picture priorities first. Do these amendments silence some would be critics of farm bill equity and fairness, to the detriment of the whole industry?


No official comment from the specialty crop farm bill alliance on today's markup and the draft mark, but I imagine the tone will be measured and even handed. Any success the industry can achieve with the farm bill on the House side still lies mainly with Rep. Cardoza.

Labels: , , , , ,

1 Comments:

At June 7, 2007 at 4:26:00 PM CDT , Anonymous Anonymous said...

SEC. 43. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR MARKET NEWS
ACTIVITIES REGARDING SPECIALTY CROPS.
• Authorizes necessary funds through 2012 for specialty crop market news
activities.

This has been a bone of contention in the terminal markets. The FFV inspection service is about, from what I understand, about 75% fee based funded. The journeymen inspectors are topped out at the GS-9 pay scale and have the most physical and technical work to perform under tight deadlines. The Market News reporters work is far less taxing and the average pay is in the GS -11 to 12 range for the journeyman reporter who doesn't have to learn as much of the vast amount of technical material or deal with the rough conditions of the work place (although some are former inspectors.) The news section of AMS somehow has gotten nearly full funding though budget allocations. Should that section also be rolled into a fee-based agency or the inspection service included in the budget with revenues from inspection fees used to offset the cost of running the proram and then bring the inspectors salary up as recommended by the wake of Operation Forbidden Fruit in Hunts Point. The inspectors are still underpaid and the inspection charges still keep rising. Unfortunately, I don't see the wholesalers represented very well in this process.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home