Stenzel testimony and coming FDA news

Amy Philpott of United sends us Tom Stenzel's prepared remarks today before the Senate Appropriations (Ag subcommittee). Stenzel was testifying today in Wisconsin in a field hearing that is also going to generate news from the FDA later today. (FDA sent a release with an embargo till 11 a.m. Central).

Stenzel effectively points out that the industry isn't a Johnny-come-lately to produce safety concerns, outlining long standing industry initiatives for GAP and GHPs in whole and fresh cut produce. He points out the implicated farm in San Benito County represented just a handful of acres among thousands planted to spinach and leafy greens.

He continues:

It is within the context of all of these industry driven efforts that I turn now to discuss what we believe to be the most appropriate regulatory framework for fresh produce safety. While there is much our industry can and must do, we also have to recognize the important role of the federal government.
Today, our country faces a critical public health challenge to increase our consumption of fresh produce. The 2005 U.S. Dietary Guidelines call on Americans to literally double our consumption of fruits and vegetables. And now, our nation is faced with an obesity crisis that threatens the long-term health of our children unless we radically change eating habits and help them learn to make healthier choices for a lifetime.
I am here today because I fear that if we do not ensure public confidence in a strong, credible and comprehensive food safety regulatory framework, we are putting that goal at risk. It is simply unacceptable for Americans to fear consuming those very fresh fruits and vegetables that are essential to their good health.


TK: Stenzel outlined three principles for a regulatory framework. Here is my quick summation
1. Consistent Produce Food Safety Standards - imported and domestic produce should have the same standards
2. Federal Oversight and Responsibility - FDA to determine appropriate nationwide standards; no new authority needed for FDA; USDA may have food safety role in marketing order regs
3. Commodity-Specific Scientific Approach; commodity specific standards should be implemented, depending on risk factors.

I like what Stenzel is saying here, though I'm not convinced the USDA marketing order role in food safety is appropriate.