Fresh Produce Discussion Blog

Created by The Packer's National Editor Tom Karst

Thursday, October 11, 2007

If anyone needed proof

The ConAgra pot pie episode may stir the pot - pardon the pun - for action on food safety legislation. Some believe that a recall should have been issued, rather than a health alert. From Rep. DeLauro comes this broadside against ConAgra:

From DeLauro:


ConAgra to Consumers: How good is your Health Insurance?

Washington, D.C. – Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro (Conn.-3) issued the following statement regarding ConAgra’s decision not to recall pot pies that have been linked to at least 152 cases of Salmonella in 31 states.
“If anyone needed proof that the current food safety system and this Administration are beholden to corporate interests, the recent ConAgra pot pie situation offers a perfect example.
ConAgra is refusing to recall their products that could be tainted with Salmonella despite direct requests from health officials in Minnesota and Oregon. This is after ConAgra blamed consumers for the Salmonella outbreak that has sickened at least 152 people in 31 states. Also, ConAgra’s decision to reject the pleas to recall the potentially contaminated products was affirmed by USDA.
“This incredibly outrageous and frightening scenario is the result of a food safety system that relies on voluntary recalls, which inherently protects corporate interests at the expense of consumers and public health. We desperately need to reform our food safety regulatory structure that includes mandatory recall authority to ensure that illnesses are minimized and consumers are protected.”

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At October 11, 2007 at 7:29:00 PM CDT , Blogger Big Apple said...

(Like trying to go up against big oil. Even bribed inspectors.)

from the internet:

Health record

In 2001, the U.S. Department of Agriculture halted operations at two ConAgra plants because of health violations. The company was threatened with shutdowns at least a half dozen more times. [citation needed] The ConAgra facility in Longmont, Colorado, had the highest rate of salmonella among all the turkey processors tested by the Department during 2001. Nearly half of the turkeys processed at ConAgra’s Longmont, Colorado, facility were contaminated with harmful Salmonella bacteria, compared with a rate of 13 percent for the industry at large.[6]

In 2002, ConAgra, together with other major food and beverage companies including PepsiCo, General Mills, Kellogg, Sara Lee, and H.J. Heinz Co., spent heavily to defeat Oregon's measure 27, which would have required food companies to label products that contain genetically modified ingredients.[7] According to the Oregon Secretary of State, ConAgra contributed $71,000 to the campaign to defeat the ballot initiative.[8]

Ethical record

In 1997 ConAgra pled guilty to federal criminal charges that its Peavey Grain unit illegally sprayed water on stored grain to increase its weight and value and also bribed Federal inspectors. The company agreed to pay $8.3 million to resolve the charges, which included a $4.4 million criminal fine, $3.45 million as compensation for illegal profits and $450,000 to reimburse the U.S. Department of Agriculture for storage and investigation expenses. ConAgra had also paid $2 million to settle a related civil case filed by a group of Indiana farmers. [9] Multinational Monitor, a corporate watchdog organization, named ConAgra one of the 'Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the 1990s'.[10]

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home