Scrutiny for AMS
How well is the USDA AMS overseeing its approved vendors of the school lunch program? From the office of Rep. Rosa DeLauro:
Congresswoman
Below is the full text of the letter.
March 20, 2008
Mr. Lloyd Day, Administrator
Agricultural Marketing Service
United States Department of Agriculture
Room 3071
Dear Administrator Day:
I am writing to express concern over the potential failure of the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to provide adequate oversight of the operations at Hallmark/Westland Meats, an approved vendor for USDA’s food and nutrition programs, including the National School Lunch Program.
Pursuant to the technical requirements for the sale of frozen ground beef products to USDA, approved vendors that do business with AMS must agree to abide by certain contractual conditions before they can sell their meat products to USDA. One of the conditions include that all cattle whose meat is harvested “shall be humanely handled in accordance with all applicable FSIS regulations, directives and notices.” Another condition is that “meat from carcasses of non-ambulatory disabled cattle will not be included in USDA purchased ground beef products.” Based on the information available, it would seem that there is serious doubt as to whether Hallmark/Westland satisfied those contractual obligations with AMS.
Furthermore, it was obvious based on the HSUS video that the non-ambulatory disabled cattle at Hallmark/Westland were wallowing in manure in the holding pens at that facility. This footage was especially disturbing given that it is well known that manure could harbor the E. coli 0157:H7 pathogen.
Another critical issue associated with the Hallmark/Westland recall involves company liability. According to USDA Announcement LS-20 (April 2005) – Purchase of Frozen Beef Products for Distribution to Child Nutrition and Other Federal Food and Nutrition Programs – the contractor shall be held liable for failure of the commodity to meet all of the contract and specifications requirements. This announcement further states that, in the event product is recalled due to a health or safety risk, the contractor is responsible for removal and replacement of recalled products and reimbursement of State and local costs incurred as a result of the recall. These costs include, at a minimum, storage, transportation, processing, and distribution of the commodities.
In preparation for your upcoming appearance before the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies Appropriations on April 9, I am requesting that you provide the Subcommittee with the following information:
1) The list of actions AMS has taken to ensure that Hallmark/Westland is being held liable for the recall, pursuant to USDA Announcement LS-20.
2) All AMS audit reports for Hallmark/Westland Meats since it became an approved vendor for USDA meat purchases;
3) All cooperative agreements between FSIS and AMS regarding inspection activities related to USDA meat purchase programs;
4) A detailed explanation of the microbial testing program used by AMS for the beef products it purchases from approved vendors;
5) The role is AMS playing in the recovery of the 143 million pounds of beef that has been recalled by FSIS.
Please provide this information to the subcommittee by April 3, 2008. Thank you very much for your attention to this issue. I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
ROSA L. DeLAURO
Chairwoman
House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture
Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration,
and Related Agencies
Labels: 5 a Day, DeLauro, E. coli, FDA, Local food movement
1 Comments:
AMS will snow them with half-truths and tons of excuses with new policies in place (that won't be enforced.) They're old hands at dodging blame and remedies. Just show them the money or bribe. They will never replace the deputy administrators on whose watch it happens. Nothing will change and DeLouro id deluding herself to think so.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home