Fresh Produce Discussion Blog

Created by The Packer's National Editor Tom Karst

Thursday, May 22, 2008

PMA to FDA: Set standards for third party audits

In comments submitted May 19, the Produce Marketing Association urges the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to standardize standards for third-party produce safety audits. From the release:

Newark, Del. – Produce Marketing Association (PMA) this week urged the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to standardize food safety audit criteria, to provide some much-needed consistency to industry third-party audit programs and to ensure they are science-based.
Writing for PMA, Chief Science Officer Dr. Robert Whitaker urged FDA to set audit standards in comments submitted to the agency May 19. PMA’s request was made as part of the association’s response to an agency request seeking information on U.S. and worldwide third-party food safety certification programs. The agency requested this information in a Federal Register notice published April 2; comments were due by May 19.
“We would hope FDA would move to establish, or partner to create, a globally recognized food safety standard that incorporates the effort the produce industry has invested in developing commodity-specific food safety programs, that are based on best current science, and that are grounded on the principles of risk assessment and risk management,” said Whitaker, summarizing PMA’s comments to the agency.
“We support the certification of third parties to perform audits, and we think it makes sense for FDA to become an accrediting body similar to USDA’s role with the National Organic Program or alternately to align itself with an existing global accreditor,” noted Whitaker. “But more importantly, right now we could use formal recognition that the body of work developed by the produce industry with the federal agencies and others over the last several years is the de facto standard,” he continued.
FDA requested comments on third-party certification, seeking information on programs in the United States and around the world. The agency also asked whether third-party certification programs ensure compliance with FDA food safety requirements, and what obstacles exist to private sector participation in these third-party certification programs. Finally FDA asked for input on what incentives would increase participation in these third-party certification programs. Whitaker provided a snapshot of produce-specific programs; he also urged the agency to proceed carefully and with ample input from industry experts from across the supply chain.
“There is value in FDA having a mechanism to certify third parties, and the agency can certainly take steps to encourage participation in third-party certification programs,” added PMA Vice President of Government Relations and Public Affairs Kathy Means. “If constructed correctly, a third-party certification program can meet the produce industry’s needs, while also addressing the over-arching objective of both the industry and FDA to improve produce food safety.”
PMA’s comments can be viewed at http://owar6exc.vancepublishing.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.pma.com/issues/FDAComments51608.cfm.

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

At May 22, 2008 at 7:29:00 AM CDT , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Asking the FDA to establish standardized "science based" criteria for third party audits is essential. For example, in the USDA's own GAP/GHP Audit Program, points are given for simply having your water tested. The results of the tests are meaningless, only the fact it was tested. All third party auditors, when issuing certification, should be following the same or similar guidelines for food safety, or some growers may simply shop around for the easiest audit to pass.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home