Fresh Produce Discussion Blog

Created by The Packer's National Editor Tom Karst

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Morning noon or night

It doesn't matter when immigration gets done, but it better happen this year. Why is it that even the most positive vibes about the potential for passing immigration reform - such as those that have surfaced this week - leaving me wondering how real the chance for success is?

Here is a link to Dallas Morning News coverage of the visit of President Bush to Mexico.

An excerpt:

"My pledge to you and your government, but more important to the people of Mexico, is I'll work as hard as I possibly can to pass comprehensive immigration reform," Mr. Bush told Mexican President Felipe Calderón during opening ceremonies for their two-day visit in this Yucatan Peninsula tourist haven.
"I remind my fellow citizens that family values do not stop at the Rio Grande River, that there are decent, hardworking, honorable citizens of Mexico who want to make a living for their families," Mr. Bush said.
In response, Mr. Calderón did not mince words. In polite but firm terms, he reminded Mr. Bush of the two countries' integrated economies and interdependent labor market, based on demand and supply of Mexican workers, and said, "Therefore, migration might not be stopped, and certainly not by decree."

And breaking his own vow to not make immigration the central theme of relations with the U.S. as Mr. Fox did during his six-year presidency, Mr. Calderón reminded Mr. Bush that as a native of the central state of Michoacan, he knows all too well the pain of families separated by immigration policies.


TK: As its leader well knows, Mexico must create more opportunities within Mexico for its own people. Yet both countries need U.S. immigration reform now.

Under the category of misery loves company, did you notice in TK Hot Picks the news from New Zealand about the shortage of harvest labor there?

A quote from the story:

"It's getting more and more difficult every year and we're going to need to import labour to fill these positions, desperately."


Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At March 14, 2007 at 9:28:00 AM CDT , Anonymous Anonymous said...

March 12, New York Times — Immigration restrictions go on trial. In a test case about the
power of cities to crack down on illegal immigration, a federal trial opened in Scranton, PA, on
Monday, March 12, in which municipal restrictions in Hazleton are being challenged as
discriminatory and overreaching. City officials in Hazleton were the first in the country to adopt
ordinances intended to drive away illegal immigrants by punishing local landlords for renting to
them and employers for giving them jobs. The restrictions, which have yet to take effect, have
been imitated by at least 80 towns and cities. “The city has responded rationally to a very real
threat,” Kris W. Kobach, a law professor at the University of Missouri−Kansas City, said in the
opening statement on behalf of Hazleton. Kobach described a surge in violent crime and gang
warfare since 2005 that city officials attribute to a growing population of illegal immigrants. It
is the first challenge to the municipal ordinances across the country to be heard in a federal
trial. Federal District Court Judge James M. Munley’s ruling could be a major marker of how
far local governments can go to limit illegal immigration.
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/us/13hazleton.html?_r=1&or ef=slogin

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home