Fresh Produce Discussion Blog

Created by The Packer's National Editor Tom Karst

Friday, April 15, 2011

Conservation and Farmland Protection at a Crossroads

Conservation and Farmland Protection at a Crossroads

Washington, D.C.—“In the years to come, we’re asking U.S. farmers to take on a double-challenge,” says Jon Scholl, President of American Farmland Trust (AFT). “First, we’re asking them to provide enough food, fiber and biofuel to meet the needs of nine billion people by 2050, and at the same time, asking them to do that under more environmental and
land resource pressure.”

It has been found that the annual erosion rate in Corn Belt states is 3.9 tons per acre. “This is a cause for concern,” says Scholl, responding to the Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) report: Losing Ground. Losing Ground provides a critical analysis of soil erosion using data collected by the USDA, Iowa State University scientists, and the Iowa Daily Erosion Project.

“AFT analysis of additional data from the National Resources Inventory also shows that each of the 48 contiguous states lost agricultural land to development,” Scholl adds. “More than 23 million acres of agricultural land were converted from 1982-2007—an area the size of the state of Indiana.”

“Simply put, conservation and farmland protection are at a crossroads,” Scholl adds. “Land and healthy soil are the strategic resources critical to our nation’s ability to feed itself and to secure our nation’s future. Conservation programs are vital to maintaining those resources.”

Scholl notes that key conservation programs, which help farmers improve and protect soil, farmland and water were cut significantly in the FY2011 federal budget. “At a time when we are debating which public programs do the most for our money—it seems prudent to invest our public agricultural support conservation now, so we are best positioned to meet the challenges ahead.”

“The challenge of our times is to be able to ramp up agricultural production under greater environmental and resource pressure—to do that in a sustainable way. Farmers deserve our support in meeting these challenges, and our country cannot afford to ignore issues like soil health, erosion and farmland loss,” Scholl says. “Conservation programs in the farm bill are vital to making sure farmers have what they need to protect their farms and our environment while also meeting the incredible production demands of a hungry world.”

Subcommittee Examines Credit Conditions for Agricultural Producers

Subcommittee Examines Credit Conditions for Agricultural Producers
WASHINGTON – Today, Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE), Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee's Subcommittee on Department Operations, Oversight, and Credit held a public hearing to review credit conditions in rural America. A number of institutions provide credit to our nation's farmers, ranchers, and rural constituents. It is important to ensure credit is readily available through institutions that are fundamentally sound.
Congress established the Farm Credit System (FCS) in the Federal Farm Loan Act of 1916 to provide a reliable source of credit to agricultural producers, certain agriculture-related businesses, and rural homeowners. The Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation ("Farmer Mac") provides credit for agricultural real estate, rural housing, and rural utility loans on the secondary loan market. Both FCS and Farmer Mac are regulated by the Farm Credit Administration (FCA), which is an independent federal agency.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA) provides direct and guaranteed loans to producers who cannot obtain credit from commercial lenders. Much of the loan dollars from FSA are reserved for beginning farmers and ranchers who do not have the required resources to obtain financing from FCS or commercial lenders.
Additionally, local banks provide a significant amount of credit for rural communities.
Members of the Subcommittee heard from two panels of witnesses that included representatives from the FSA, FCA, Farmer Mac, the Federal Reserve Bank, local banks, and the agriculture community. They provided insight into the availability of credit for producers and the potential risks.
"While conditions are generally good in rural America, the agricultural economy is highly cyclical. We must ensure that good and fair farm and agricultural credit policies are in place to further strengthen agriculture’s critical role in our nation’s economic, energy, and national security," said Chairman Jeff Fortenberry.
"I'm grateful to have had an opportunity to discuss the soundness of credit extended to farmers and how that credit affects the larger economy.   These issues will affect the food Americans serve their families and play a role in our economic recovery.  I hope to continue productive conversations on the topic," said Ranking Member Marcia L. Fudge.
Written testimony provided by the witnesses is available below and can be found on the Committee's website by clicking here.
Witness List:
Panel I
Mr. Val Dolcini, Acting Administrator, Farm Service Agency, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Accompanied by:
Mr. Chris Beyerhelm, Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs, Farm Service Agency, U.S.    Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
The Honorable Leland A. Strom, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia
Mr. Jason Henderson, Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Panel II
Mr. Michael A. Gerber, President and Chief Executive Officer, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac), Washington, D.C.
Mr. Doug Stark, President and Chief Executive Officer, Farm Credit Services of America, on behalf of the Farm Credit System, Omaha, Nebraska
Mr. Matthew H. Williams, Chairman and President, Gothenburg State Bank, on behalf of the American Bankers Association, Gothenburg, Nebraska
Mr. Matt Starline, Owner, Starline Organics, LLC, Athens, Ohio