Cantaloupe market look in
Labels: FDA
Created by The Packer's National Editor Tom Karst
Another week of food ads is upon us in suburban Kansas City, with asparagus the leading feature at Price Chopper at $1.88 per pound and at HyVee at $1.99 per pound. Jumbo red scarlotta grapes from SunWorld won top billing in the Hen House food ad at $1.48 per pound, while Dillons featured Kroger Russet potatoes at a two for one deal on 5-pound bags.
From Guest Blogger Pamela R.:
Labels: FDA
The full Senate is expected to debate the farm bill next week. Here is an audio link of the Sen. Tom Harkin teleconference of last Thursday, not long after the Senate Agriculture Committee passed the farm bill out of committee. He trumpets the f/v program and said that he believes the total bill will find pretty good support on the floor, though he said there will be amendments on payment limits, nutrition and rural development. Harkin is expected to have another press conference tomorrow. Meanwhile, Harkin's office release the following about the fruit and vegetable program:
Senate Farm Bill Expands Access to Fresh
Fruits and Vegetables for Iowa
Students
65,000 Iowa school children will now have access, Up from 12,000 currently enrolled
Washington, D.C. – The 2007 farm bill that passed the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry last week invests heavily in The Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) and will expand access to the program for elementary students in Iowa and around the country, Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) said today. This investment will enable up to 65,000 Iowa school children to participate in the program, more than a five fold increase from the 12,000 Iowa school children who attend participating Iowa schools in the 2007-08 school year. Harkin is Chairman of the Committee and the author of the FFVP.
“The farm bill is about food and nutrition and should be an opportunity to encourage healthy diets and promote health. With this historic expansion of the Fruit and Vegetable Program, not only do we make a tremendous investment in the health of our children, but we also expand the idea of what a farm bill can and should be.” said Harkin. “What began as an immensely successful pilot program just 5 years ago will now grow into a national program that encourages fresh fruit and vegetable consumption to million of elementary school children across the country, particularly those in disadvantaged communities. I am delighted we are expanding the program in Iowa and nationally.” “Senator Harkin has been a true leader in nutrition. His efforts to increase fruit and vegetable access for low-income children is an example of his dedication to improving nutritious offerings for Iowans,” said Sister Ladonna Woerdeman, diabetes outpatient educator, registered dietitian, and media representative for the Iowa Dietetic Association.
When fully implemented, the FFVP funding levels will enable up to 4.5 million elementary school children to receive free fresh fruits and vegetables at school. The Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program began as a pilot program when Senator Harkin authored it in the 2002 farm bill. Iowa was one of the 4 original pilot
states.
Currently, this program receives $15 million annually,
serving 14 states plus 3 Indian Tribal Organizations. They
are:
Indiana
North
Carolina
Utah
Iowa
WashingtonIdaho
Michigan
Wisconsin
New Mexico
Mississippi
TexasPine Ridge in South Dakota
Ohio
Connecticut
Zuni in New Mexico
Pennsylvania
UtahInter-Tribal Council of Arizona
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, only 14 percent of children meet dietary recommendations for fruit consumption. And only 20 percent meet dietary recommendations for vegetable consumption.
Please feel free to forward this update to whomever you think would be interested in the information. If this was sent to you by a friend or colleague and you wish to be on the mailing list or you would like to subscribe to newsletters on other issues.
Labels: audio files, Citrus, Farm Bill, FDA, Harkin, Tom Harkin
We haven't had a plethora of votes on the Fruits and Veggies - More Matters blog question this week, (where's the passion, people?) but early returns suggest that the launch of the More Matters campaign met expectations of Fresh Talk readers. Please vote on the poll question soon, as it will close in a couple of days.
TK: My first instinct is to say the fresh produce industry has for too long been blind to the opportunity to create a national checkoff program for fresh fruits and vegetables. What would generic promotion of fresh produce look like if there was a mandatory assessment on all produce marketers? The National Cattlemen's Beef Association in 2005 had a budget of about $62 million to carry out checkoff funded promotions for beef. Compare that to the $5-6 million the Produce for Better Health Foundation typically has at its disposal. Some would argue that generic promotion ( including the authors of the research cited above) would make it harder for brand marketers to differentiate their products. Generic advertising also may increase responsiveness to price and reduce consumer information about non-advertised traits. Despite those limitations and reservations, I think the industry needs to field a generic promotion campaign that is representative with beef and milk (about $60 million and $100 million, respectively). Generic promotion raises visibility and helps define the message that consumers associate with fresh produce. In my view, the only way to fund an annual promotion effort that would invest $40 million to $50 million in consumer promotions is with a mandatory checkoff program for fresh produce. It's time for industry leaders to make it happen.Some background grafs on generic promotion:
"In 1937, Congress enacted the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act. The goal of the legislation was to establish marketing rules for farm commodities and to encourage the marketing of these commodities via industry committees. Producers of commodities were required to remit a small percentage of their proceeds to commodity boards that pooled the resources and used them to promote consumption. As of 1990, 30 commodity boards had been established by Acts of Congress.
During the 1990s, rulings by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in California weakened legislation that forced producers to make mandatory contributions for generic advertising. In December 1993, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) almond marketing order and, in June 1995, the USDA nectarine and peach marketing order were found unconstitutional. The court reasoned that generic advertising had not been shown to be more successful at increasing primary demand than brand advertising. Thus, growers should be able to use their money to advertise individually. In response to the findings of the Ninth Circuit Court, the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 authorized check-off generic advertising programs. The legislation includes a congressional finding that generic advertising programs are in the national public interest and vital to the welfare of the agricultural economy. Moreover, the legislation states that generic advertising programs "never were designed or intended to restrict, prohibit, or replace the advertising and promotion activities of any individuals or groups of individuals" (Becker 1996, p. 1). These check-off programs can be initiated by the USDA and, if approved in a referendum of industry participants, can require producers to "pay assessments which are used to fund generic (as opposed to branded) promotion, research, advertising, and related activities designed to increase consumption of that commodity" (Becker 1996, p. 1). As of 2001, 13 of the 20 national check-off programs (e.g., dairy, fluid milk, beef, soybeans, cotton, pork) authorized by Congress were active, as were approximately 35 commodity programs being run by state organizations (e.g., apples, avocados, orange juice.)The research concludes:
"More than a billion dollars is spent annually on generic advertisements that promote the consumption of commodity goods. Generic advertising is designed to increase primary demand, or the "size of the pie," without affecting selective demand, or the "share of the pie." We find evidence to the contrary generic advertising increases the consumer's sensitivity to changes in price and systematically alters brand preferences. These effects of generic advertising can be attributed to the tendency of generic ads to change the relative importance of the attributes used to evaluate the brands. The results have implications for the public policy issue of how to effectively implement generic advertising without differentially benefiting certain brands and the managerial issue of how to integrate generic and brand advertising in order to achieve product category and brand differentiation goals. "
Labels: Apples, Elizabeth Pivonka, FDA, Fresh Produce Industry Discussion Group, Fruits and Veggies More Matters, poll